Financial situation:
The standard rate for 2 adults and 3 children (2x6-13, 1x 0-5 years) is currently 2,149 EUR. This is considered the subsistence minimum.
Calculate your house installment, 2,600 EUR, plus additional costs around 500 EUR, plus subsistence minimum for living. Then you are already close to your household net income...
If after deducting installment, additional costs, and savings "only" 2,500 to 3,000 EUR remain, then that's okay. But with 3 children, you can't make big leaps anymore.
Especially if you now pay 700 EUR cold rent. That will be quite an adjustment.
But if child 3 drops out, financially it will hit a bit.
That is helpful. For exactly these reasons, we also aim for a lower construction sum, i.e., installment. Let's say 2,000 to 2,200. Hoping that this will work, see below under construction plans.
As soon as one child is out, probably even earlier, my wife can start working. At least that’s the plan. We are not per se against her working. So there is an option here to offset inflation etc. But we do not want to build from the start in a way that she
has to go to work within the next few years (child 3 is still very young) because we financially overstretched ourselves.
I find the point about donations with 600€ very interesting. One zero too many?
In that respect, it fits at least that you want to build rather modestly. But then you really have to.
We do gladly, it is a matter of priorities. By the way, the donation amount is about 10% of the official income.
Construction plans:
Don’t be mad at me, but if you seriously allocate 33m² for 3 children's rooms, i.e., 11m² each, but 25m² for your own bedroom and 15 for the office... please don’t build like that... the priorities are already wrong from the start...
There is a misunderstanding. Maybe because I communicated badly.
Otherwise, it wouldn’t be "wanting to build modestly" anymore.
Maybe this helps to understand how I thought: The upper floor (OG) is decisive for the floor area of the stories and thus for the total living space. If total living space should be less than 150sqm, then the OG has to be correspondingly small. In the attic (DG), the floor sizes then result accordingly (gable roof, so living area is smaller than on the OG). Certainly, it would be possible to shift a room from the OG to the DG, but I doubt that is sensible.
In the bedroom is a double bed and a large wardrobe, no luxury stuff, but also for storing parents' stuff/family stuff well. Therefore, it must be about 15sqm or so. A loft bed can provide space next to the desk and a small wardrobe in the children's room. Of course, it could be 12 or 13sqm, but it doesn’t have to be.
The office can be from my side 6 to 7sqm. But if it is bigger because of the attic slopes, storage space will also be accommodated here.
A prison solitary cell has at least 9m².
Wrong comparison. Children at our home have a living room, a garden, ... Possibly two boys share a room for sleeping and share one for playing, possibly parents and children swap for a larger floor area. So much is conceivable at home. And, it may surprise, but our children will also occasionally get some exercise and are not prisoners. ;-)
A technology or utility room of 8sqm is already tight for 2 people, for 5 people the utility room and storage options can’t be sufficient enough.
With a rental flat you don’t have the building technology in your apartment and normally have a basement room and sometimes an additional laundry room. You have to consider this space in the house as well.
We have thought a bit about storage options, see above. Of course, bikes don’t necessarily have to go to the attic.
But maybe some of the building technology could even go into the attic? Conceivable? Sensible?
Then a bit of space for laundry and similar would be free on the ground floor.
Overall situation:
From another thread (Assessment new build 2025/2026 - BW rural area | page 4 | Post #20):
And exactly THAT determines the final price. 160sqm "have to" be now.
Then you cannot build cheaply either - plus the upscale wishes.
Not a problem. You just have to be able to afford it. But it is simply wrong that you "have to" spend huge sums on a house. A family of four can also manage well with 125sqm including a study. Only no one who seeks support here wants that.
Yes, we want to. Or am I overlooking something?
Of course, this is related to a family of four and not 1:1 transferable. But please think exactly in this direction: not too big, but sensibly small.
Under about 150 sqm it will not work for 5 people.
I am not quite convinced yet.