Thanks again for your feedback.
After brought up the insurance topic again, something immediately caught my eye that I hadn’t really realized before.
We actually don’t need an (expensive) capital-forming life insurance anymore if we take out the term life insurance for the house anyway and now build up our capital for retirement in other ways. So there is definitely potential for savings.
The catch here is that the insurances were arranged within the family and that there will be endless discussions again that “this is all wrong, canceling this nonsense now!!!!”, but we have to get through that :)
Thank you very much for the input, you have helped me enormously with my decision-making process.
But I would be a bit more cautious:
1. If a life insurance already exists (in this case a capital-forming one), is the death benefit sufficient so that one can save on taking out a new term life insurance?
2. Disadvantage of a new contract: higher entry age and possibly problems with health/risk questions.
3. What minimum interest rate was agreed for the savings portions? Old contracts can be considerably better than what the capital market currently offers.
4. Therefore, check whether premium suspension might be the better alternative.
5. I do not see that, as a property owner, one can do without other private retirement provisions.
I advise reviewing the contract and reconsidering whether it still makes sense in its current form or needs to be adjusted.
Simply canceling the contract without further data is not a good recommendation.