Feedback on our land selection desired

Congratulations.

Thanks :)

So, today we also received more data and a purchase contract... we need to take a very close look at everything. The basic location of the property is really nice. However, there are 2 things that I still need to research further and would like to ask here what I should pay attention to.

1. Apparently, there is an old supply well there, which is not completely removed by the seller. The purchase contract states: The buyer is aware that there was a well on the property subject to this contract, which the seller has dismantled at least 3 meters below ground and sealed with cement. The location of the former well can be found on the site plan known to the buyer and handed over before today's notarization.
It looks like this
[ATTACH alt="20210306_140123.jpg" type="full"]58703[/ATTACH]

According to the remediation report, it was planned to remove it completely but was canceled at short notice - reasons were not given. We also have not received an exact site plan showing its location. I will have to request that again.

I suspect: rolled onto the public road. And I could imagine that one has to become a co-owner with 24 (possibly also if you do not have to enter via the private road) of the private road. My favorites would probably be 19 and 15.

And number 26 cannot get onto the property without going over 27 or the footpath in front. Therefore, this is a bit unclear to me. The blue line would fit quite well with a turning hammerhead at the end of the private road but that also takes some of the property away.

I also tend toward 26, but would inquire about what else is planned, because the location looks like further development is planned. Then 26 would not be so great anymore.

Right. They also made the mistake with numbers 2, 3 and 32. I assume that the end areas of the private roads are distributor points...

So, this topic is also ongoing. The purchase contract states that there is an entry in section II regarding rights of way and utility rights and that something else is coming. (The seller declares that a road construction charge is still to be registered, otherwise he is not aware of any further charges.)
According to the cadastre, the property looks like this


In the documents we have now received, this access wedge is designated as access for our and the neighboring properties - the wedge is about 26 m², which would then be ours but apparently has to serve as access for the neighboring properties..?


I am now wondering: Which documents should I best request here? A current land register, extract of charges? What else?

And what pitfalls are there and what can I possibly still influence?

You will probably receive the mentioned documents with the notary contract. You have only received the draft so far. You should still request the documents mentioned in the contract. The well is obvious. You can see it.

Is the property developed?

Are the marketed surveying points already available?

Who owns the private roads?

You will probably receive the mentioned documents with the notary contract. You have only received the draft so far. You should still request the documents mentioned in the contract. The well is obvious. You can see it. Is the plot developed? Are the marketed survey points already there? Who owns the private roads?

Hello! Private roads belong one-fifth each to the 5 lower plots that have their access there. So, two weeks ago the survey points were not there yet; there were still sand dunes. The development is supposed to be finished after Easter. Yes, I can certainly "see" it, but I don't have any document showing where it is on the plot (within the building boundary, for example). And isn't it too late to receive these documents only at the notary appointment? And yes, it is only the draft.

And isn't it too late to receive these documents only at the notary appointment?

I did write that I would request them in advance.

Oh, I see, then I misunderstood you.

I have now contacted the seller to ask how exactly this is planned. Maybe the plan is simply wrong? But actually, I can't imagine that either, because the neighboring properties would only have a 2.5-meter-wide passage to their properties.