Feedback on our land selection desired

  • Erstellt am 2021-01-30 14:46:21

hampshire

2021-01-30 18:42:31
  • #1
I also tend towards 26, but I would ask what else is planned, because the situation looks like further development is planned. Then 26 can no longer be that great.
 

ypg

2021-01-30 19:15:56
  • #2
That's right. They also made the mistake with numbers 2, 3, and 32. I assume that the end sections of the private roads are distribution points...
 

blubbernase

2021-01-30 19:31:07
  • #3
Thank you very much for your input! I'll go through it step by step:


Unfortunately, this is not clear yet and was not included in the documents either. But I have already asked about it.

Yes, they are allowed.

No, that was my attempt to overlay the 2 files.

Very good question! No idea.



Attached is the equivalent augm development plan
 

11ant

2021-01-31 01:14:37
  • #4

Oh - I was thinking of fields, but it looks more like an industrial wasteland is being developed.
 

blubbernase

2021-01-31 01:53:20
  • #5
Yes, an old factory, I think they built tractors or something there. Here is an aerial photo, 26 would be in the corner.
 

blubbernase

2021-03-01 11:43:24
  • #6
*drummrolls*

last night then the call: number 27 is offered to us! Now it begins!:):D
 
Oben