Saruss
2016-07-24 11:50:57
- #1
Hello Saruss, thank you very much for the detailed explanation. Exactly such a thing is very interesting.. I just didn’t quite understand what the 20 days are that come out in your calculation.. Is that the time the instantaneous water heater could now heat to compensate for the heat loss of the storage tank (cost-wise)? Best regards Steffi.
The 20 days are the time you can keep the water in the storage warm without it being more expensive than with the instantaneous water heater, i.e. if you need more hot water in 20 days than the storage tank can hold (which is probably usually the case....), the hot water from the storage is cheaper than with the electric instantaneous water heater. How much cheaper then depends on the details, which tariffs you have, how much hot water you need, etc... If you keep that in mind, it’s immediately clear that you could never pay for the hot water via instantaneous water heater just based on the loss costs. The only thing you can calculate is whether the investment in storage and boiler, etc., pays off within 10 years; for that you have to calculate with your actual consumption. From on the go