Fall protection on height changes (partially over 1.00 m)

What is actually your goal for fall protection?

[*]Obtaining insurance coverage if someone falls - then check with the insurance and get the construction approved or have the static properties certified [*]Maximum accident protection - build a very strong fence without gaps >12cm [*]Pragmatic accident protection - a hedge is sufficient [*]Comply with local requirements - ask and do what you have to do [*]Everyone says I have to build it, but I don't want to - just don't do it

My thoughts are still quite fresh, so I haven’t made a concrete plan yet. For me, it’s more about accident prevention. Hence the idea with the double wire mesh fence. Regarding insurance coverage, it’s a tricky issue...what I haven’t mentioned yet is that this is about a multi-family house, but only we are allowed to use the garden. Therefore, it is common property, but we have special usage rights. I would say liability therefore lies with all owners. However, since it is not legally required in my case to build a fence, the costs fall to me if I want the safety...or!? In terms of liability, if something happens, then rather every owner is involved.

If you don’t know these regulations beforehand, how are you supposed to know when signing? Your reading comprehension here seems really poor. I understand quite a bit; you, on the other hand, seem to have problems understanding. Where did I say that I WANT him to do it at his own expense? I merely asked how it looks. But from you, there are only half sentences meant to provoke... you contribute nothing of substance.

No, it was asked a few times what is in the contract. Only hot air came.

No, it was asked a few times what is in the contract. Only hot air came back

I have also responded to that. Sorry, but you are just hot air here in the thread. Do you want to help like the others or just stir up trouble without reason? I don’t even know why you are acting so aggressively here; I haven’t attacked you or anything. I would ask you to leave the thread so that the discussion can continue constructively and your incitements don’t disrupt the conversations.

The double rod mesh fence at 1+x m will largely fulfill your goal of accident prevention, as no one will unintentionally fall over it unless they previously attempted to climb it. The solution fits the goal.

Even though I do not like the style of in this thread, he does have a point regarding your question in #1 about whether the builder has to pay for the fence. That would be stated in the contract or in the construction description. Surely the fall protection at the windows is included there. That is what he asked about and is now apparently a bit annoyed that the question was not answered, which is reflected in the style.

If you don't know these regulations beforehand, how are you supposed to know when signing?

That belongs to maturity – one decides to sign something and simply bears the consequences of their blind spots. Only if deception or violation of a duty to inform occurs is one protected. That is probably not the case here.

The wind load is not a problem for the feet mentioned by you. Even if it is separate property, the owners' association must decide on it.

The double rod mesh fence in 1+x m will largely fulfill your goal of accident prevention, as no one will accidentally fall over it unless they previously attempted to climb it. The solution fits the goal.

I think so too, especially since the hedge is still in front of it, which is also getting denser.

Even though I don't like the style of in this thread, he does have a point regarding your question in #1 about whether the developer has to pay for the fence. That would be stated in the contract or in the construction description. Surely the fall protection at the windows is included there. He asked about that and is now apparently a bit annoyed that the question was not answered, which is reflected in his style.

That is part of maturity – you decide to sign something and simply bear the consequences of your blind spots. You are only protected if there is deception or a breach of the duty to inform. That probably doesn’t apply here.

First, as I said, I already wrote that there is probably nothing about the fence in the contract... why should there be? I will check, but I already know the result. So I don’t really understand why someone would get annoyed about something like that... a bit irritable, or what? Anyway…

Second, I have also seen and accepted that. Ignorance of the law does not protect against punishment, in my case against additional costs. So be it, that’s how it is. That he accuses me of not understanding anything is more than arrogant and presumptuous.