Hello, Michael,
I have some questions and comments regarding this:
[*]My parents' house is very old (1936), well maintained but not up to the latest technical standards. The house has an estimated value of 50,000 euros.
Who determined this value? Personal estimate?
If the value is plausible, the value of your brother’s inheritance drops to zero, since your parents’ roughly 22-year usufruct right will statistically "consume" the value of the house.
It is also questionable what to do with a house that hardly has any value today and would more or less already need to be completely renovated to meet the current technical standards, after another +20 years of use. The house probably has a remaining useful life in its current condition of about 20 years, possibly less. Conversely, this means that you would have to invest massively
now in order to still have a value in 20 years that your brother inherits. Otherwise, your brother will only inherit demolition costs.
Furthermore, it must be clarified now in what form an extension to the old house would be built, i.e., can your parents’ house be demolished without affecting your new building?
[*]I have a brother, his inheritance must be taken into account in the agreement.
See above – the question is whether your brother inherits anything at all besides the value of the land.
[*]I have informed myself at the building authority; the property cannot be divided.
That is possible, but very unlikely. Contact a publicly appointed surveyor from your region – any professional colleague can explain to you shortly what options are available, they only need the correct address or the parcel designation (district, block, parcel).
If possible, I would like to have my parents' property registered as a land charge to get a more attractive loan.
If I were your brother, I would object to that. For this reason alone, it should definitely be checked whether the division can actually be carried out – otherwise, you have to resort to the crutch of “partial ownership,” which legally means that everything is somehow always connected. This is great for the lending bank – they take everything in doubt. This would be bad for your brother, because if you fail to service the loan, everything could go into foreclosure. Neither you, your brother, nor your parents have an interest in that.
1. My parents transfer half of the property to me. Since division of the property is not possible, I will probably have to be entered in the land register? Or does a residential property ownership (WEG) have to be established (similar to condominiums in multi-family homes)? I am now paying out my brother a quarter. The other half including the house will later be divided 50/50.
I do not understand the idea of the 1/4 payout at all. That complicates everything.
In any case, you would become the owner in the land register, supplemented by a subdivision plan.
2. The entire property remains in my parents' ownership, I am building now.
The entire property does
not remain in your parents’ ownership/property.
In the event of my parents’ death, it will be divided between my brother and me. We are considering that he gets the house since he has had to wait longer for his inheritance.
There will be no division anymore; your brother takes over your parents’ shares completely if he is not (partially) paid out currently.
Have a notary explain this to you calmly; in my opinion, various thoughts are going in a completely wrong direction/conception.
In my assessment, the deal is extremely bad for your brother because he bears the entire risk that your parents’ house will still have any value in 20 years, and he also carries your loan default risk. Basically, he has to hope to invest regularly now and in the future, completely renovate and/or demolish everything in 20 years, and only then can he build/live there himself.
You, on the other hand, get building-ready land and can do whatever you want immediately.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe