Error from the office - No legally compliant and error-free development plan

  • Erstellt am 2020-01-31 13:31:53

ypg

2020-01-31 20:12:08
  • #1


All good. The quote did not show the single-story aspect. I have already commented on the thread.


I have to puke soon...
The desire for the work you were trained for? That is expected of you every day? A good working atmosphere? Great working conditions?
No, I am not a civil servant!
 

ttiggerin

2020-01-31 20:30:13
  • #2
Why should a civil servant or employee in the public sector be more or less motivated than someone in the private sector? That probably has more to do with one's own personality. This thread has as much content as a balloon and should be closed
 

Joedreck

2020-01-31 20:30:53
  • #3
Bashing civil servants is always great. Because no one thinks about who actually is a civil servant and what the purpose of the civil service even is.
Besides the fact that police officers make sure no marauding hordes just take your property, the civil servants of the professional fire brigade ensure that wildfires do not spread in big cities. In addition, these people also like to work in emergency medical services.
Furthermore, civil servants do not have to fear unjustified complaints, so they can do their job as carefully and lawfully as possible without worries about their livelihood. By the way, dependence on the state also ensures that they are less likely to hold out their hand. Because courts really dislike corruption offenses. And then the existence of the civil servant would be destroyed. That’s not worth 200€. Otherwise the neighbor with plenty of money simply builds outside the development plan because he bribed the civil servant at the building authority accordingly.
In addition, the ban on strikes precisely ensures that the basic functions of the state always work.
I certainly wouldn’t be keen on looking after my children for 8 weeks because the teachers are involved in a collective bargaining dispute.

Bashing professional groups shows neither wit nor charm, but rather shortsightedness and pettiness.
 

Bookstar

2020-01-31 20:39:29
  • #4
I totally agree!
 

kaho674

2020-01-31 20:42:28
  • #5
I don’t understand at all why this is now targeting civil servants. Whoever messes up at the office doesn’t really matter at first. Even if the one case cited here was wrong (apparently it wasn’t just me who misunderstood it), the example of [goalkeeper] immediately comes to mind next. Legally not problematic but content-wise quite a disaster, right?
 

Joedreck

2020-01-31 20:51:46
  • #6
Yes, it went badly. The remedy for that would be: hire extremely professionally competent, legally well-advised staff. But that is not possible with a clerk position in group A9. The staff wants to be paid properly. Otherwise, they head towards the private sector, where the cash register rings.
 
Oben