Enclosure to the neighbor according to the development plan

Fence on the borders and plant the hedge very close at the recommended planting distance as follows: one to the right of the fence, one to the left of the fence, one to the right, one to the left, and so on. Then the hedge stands on both properties, meaning the case is clear forever: everyone has to cut their side, because it is basically like "2" hedges.

Thank you for your answers.

The neighbor is not our problem, it is the building authority. If the neighbor now plants a hedge in front of his fence, he would be practically adjoining us, at least one could argue that way. The hedge on the boundary alone would be allowed.

The problem is rather that we both would prefer to have the fence, but because of the building authority the hedge has to be in between. The landscaper left 50 cm of distance to the public area for the hedge. If you take the development plan literally, you could now plant a hedge on each side of the boundary or a hedge on the boundary, and both then place the fence in front of it. In the end, fence, 60 cm hedge, fence. That would of course be completely illogical, which the whole thing actually is anyway, since the whole area is fenced off anyway and is no longer visible from outside.

The hedge can only be maintained from the outside towards the public properties. The hedge itself does not come through the fence.

The discussion is preposterous. It's obvious to you yourselves that two fences with a hedge in between is nonsense. I also don't understand at all why anyone would rather look at a fence than a hedge. But if every neighbor insists on it, then it stays as described. Your fence + hedge must stand on your land and the same goes for the neighbor. Or you finally come to an agreement.

What should we agree on? Who installs the fence or to whom the fence is attributed? With the neighbors opposite, who have the same problem, the city requires that there be a hedge on both sides, which is not stated anywhere in the development plan.

Could it be that you are misreading something in the development plan or misunderstanding the building authority? There is nothing on the boundary! That would somehow go against any property rights.

Hi,

Development plan:
Fences are only allowed as deciduous hedges - also with integrated or fences installed on the inside of the property - permitted. The fences may not exceed a height of 1.80m.

Wikipedia:
Einfriedung (obsolete also Einfriedung) is a structure on or at a Grundstücksgrenze, which is intended to enclose a Grundstück completely or partially and shield it externally to prevent unauthorized entry or exit or other disturbing influences.

Where else should the hedge go other than on or at the property boundary? I would like to understand it; the regulation makes sense on all other boundaries, just not for direct neighboring properties.

Regards
Sascha