slpot
2019-01-13 13:18:10
- #1
Hello,
some time ago we moved into our new house. Our neighbor requested a privacy screen between the properties, so far everything is fine.
Fences are only permitted according to the development plan as deciduous hedges - also with integrated or erected fences on the inside of the property - permitted. The fences must not exceed a height of 1.80m.
We would now prefer this fence on the inside or have it on the public areas as well. On the public areas this is also not a problem, hedge on the public side, conditions fulfilled.
The problem now is that this does not work on the direct borders to the neighbor. According to the requirements of the development plan, one or two hedges would have to be on the border, which can then each have inward-facing fences to the properties. I would have this built like that, but it doesn’t really seem quite right.
The statements made at the time by the ladies and gentlemen from the building authority during the meeting with the new property owners were that the city would not interfere and the neighbors should settle this themselves, but now, after complaints from outside, no one wants to know anything about it anymore. Over 90% of the fences currently standing in the building area are now, of course, on the border and there are only 1 or 2 properties where hedges are included, probably more by coincidence. With wire mesh fences this is of course somewhat easier to change.
For all neighbors with opaque fences, I have now heard from another neighbor that the city now wants hedges planted on both sides, which was not intended and we do not want that either. We would probably have completely avoided the fence, but we do not have a problem with one either.
I now suspect that the city had a different idea about the inward fences but simply did not consider that with this it has effectively legitimized 1.80m closed fences of any kind.
If there were a hedge on the border, which neighbor would then have the right to the fence? I am currently a bit at a loss as to how we should proceed, especially since this also makes little sense in terms of external appearance, as fences with hedges are anyway around, and the whole thing would not be visible to outsiders anyway.
Maybe I just simply misunderstand the part of the development plan and its interpretation.
Regards Sascha
some time ago we moved into our new house. Our neighbor requested a privacy screen between the properties, so far everything is fine.
Fences are only permitted according to the development plan as deciduous hedges - also with integrated or erected fences on the inside of the property - permitted. The fences must not exceed a height of 1.80m.
We would now prefer this fence on the inside or have it on the public areas as well. On the public areas this is also not a problem, hedge on the public side, conditions fulfilled.
The problem now is that this does not work on the direct borders to the neighbor. According to the requirements of the development plan, one or two hedges would have to be on the border, which can then each have inward-facing fences to the properties. I would have this built like that, but it doesn’t really seem quite right.
The statements made at the time by the ladies and gentlemen from the building authority during the meeting with the new property owners were that the city would not interfere and the neighbors should settle this themselves, but now, after complaints from outside, no one wants to know anything about it anymore. Over 90% of the fences currently standing in the building area are now, of course, on the border and there are only 1 or 2 properties where hedges are included, probably more by coincidence. With wire mesh fences this is of course somewhat easier to change.
For all neighbors with opaque fences, I have now heard from another neighbor that the city now wants hedges planted on both sides, which was not intended and we do not want that either. We would probably have completely avoided the fence, but we do not have a problem with one either.
I now suspect that the city had a different idea about the inward fences but simply did not consider that with this it has effectively legitimized 1.80m closed fences of any kind.
If there were a hedge on the border, which neighbor would then have the right to the fence? I am currently a bit at a loss as to how we should proceed, especially since this also makes little sense in terms of external appearance, as fences with hedges are anyway around, and the whole thing would not be visible to outsiders anyway.
Maybe I just simply misunderstand the part of the development plan and its interpretation.
Regards Sascha