Matthew03
2019-01-30 13:32:50
- #1
Are there any other property-related constructive suggestions regarding the construction method of the house?
...you have already received those in the sense of the repeatedly mentioned shed roof, haven’t you?!
Eaves height and roof shape in new construction planning
- Erstellt am 2019-01-29 08:38:44
...you have already received those in the sense of the repeatedly mentioned shed roof, haven’t you?!
11ant
2019-01-30 13:56:38
- #2
Can you actually tell from the development plan how the house has to be oriented? Like horizontal or vertical? It is shown vertically with the long side from north to south!
Funny enough, the green plan with the red gable-roofed houses largely depicts the development outside the building windows of the development plan – misleading in the exposé, I would say, and I would assign it no importance; the official ridge direction would be a vector in the plan image and/or mentioned in the text.
I really don’t understand why I so often end up on the ignore list of the original posters.
§1: "Don’t confuse me with facts!"
Escroda
2019-01-30 15:45:45
- #3
Ok, then with pictures.§1: "Don't confuse me with facts!"
Guido1980
2019-02-03 13:58:15
- #4
But here the maximum eave height would probably only be observed on the north side due to the slope of the terrain and no longer on the south side, right? Does maximum ridge height mean on all sides or only on the lowest side?Ok, then with pictures.View East light green: natural terrain dark green: planned terrain green dotted: boundary House entrance: the stairs next to the garage up
Escroda
2019-02-03 20:14:34
- #5
But the eaves height according to "your" development plan does not refer to the ground levels, but to the upper edge of the finished ground floor slab, which is set at a maximum of 107m above NHN for your plot. In this respect, the terrain topography does not matter to you. Only your ground floor height needs to be fine-tuned. Therefore, in my picture, the upper floor must be declared as the ground floor. Whether this will be approved, I do not know, but at the moment I see nothing that should speak against it.
Guido1980
2019-02-03 22:03:04
- #6
But according to "your" development plan, the eaves height does not refer to the terrain heights, but to the top edge of the finished ground floor, which is set at a maximum of 107m above NHN for your property. Therefore, the terrain topography does not matter to you. Only your ground floor height needs to be finely adjusted. That is why in my picture the upper floor has to be declared as the ground floor. Whether that will be accepted, I do not know, but at the moment I see nothing that should speak against it.
Of course, I lack the experience, but as a layperson, I would at least view it critically that the actual upper floor is defined as the ground floor.
While browsing the internet, I noticed that there are city villas that have an offset between the ground floor and upper floor and effectively two eaves.
Heinz von Heiden, for example, offers something like that as the city villa "Falkensee." Something like that should be possible, or does the second/upper eave then also apply?