Grym
2015-07-20 19:47:52
- #1
Certainly, this discussion has probably happened once or twice already – but now, more currently asked – what does the technology look like in 2015?
I want to exclude soundproofing from the discussion, since we are in a very quiet residential area, as probably most residential areas are. I don’t want to discuss the special case of house construction in flight paths, on main roads, or similar, especially since such a double or triple layered wall also provides some soundproofing (actually a very good one).
I have always had concerns about mold, but on the other hand, where should the moisture come from? In the event of a pipe break and massive moisture damage, you have worse problems in a solid house according to various sources than in a wooden house. The procedure here is to remove the plasterboard, throw away the insulation (at the affected spot), let it dry for a week (with controlled living space ventilation + professional equipment), new insulation, close it up, done.
Normally, without a pipe break, no moisture should penetrate, right? As with a solid house, only the first millimeters of the wall serve as a moisture buffer. The breathable wall, as is well known, does not exist.
Regarding summer heat protection, I have experienced that even shaded massive model houses heated up quite a bit over the weekend. The two house types are comparable in this respect. I even read that the heat cannot be released from the masonry at night, whereas with the wooden house, with little storage mass, you can ventilate and thus reduce the temperature or even create pleasant temperatures with a brine-earth heat exchanger in controlled living space ventilation.
What about durability: why is it said that wooden houses supposedly don’t last as long, and what is a realistic lifespan?
What are the real disadvantages of a modern timber-frame prefabricated house from established providers (Bien-Zenker, Weberhaus)? Not meant are those things from Poland or the Hunsrück.
I want to exclude soundproofing from the discussion, since we are in a very quiet residential area, as probably most residential areas are. I don’t want to discuss the special case of house construction in flight paths, on main roads, or similar, especially since such a double or triple layered wall also provides some soundproofing (actually a very good one).
I have always had concerns about mold, but on the other hand, where should the moisture come from? In the event of a pipe break and massive moisture damage, you have worse problems in a solid house according to various sources than in a wooden house. The procedure here is to remove the plasterboard, throw away the insulation (at the affected spot), let it dry for a week (with controlled living space ventilation + professional equipment), new insulation, close it up, done.
Normally, without a pipe break, no moisture should penetrate, right? As with a solid house, only the first millimeters of the wall serve as a moisture buffer. The breathable wall, as is well known, does not exist.
Regarding summer heat protection, I have experienced that even shaded massive model houses heated up quite a bit over the weekend. The two house types are comparable in this respect. I even read that the heat cannot be released from the masonry at night, whereas with the wooden house, with little storage mass, you can ventilate and thus reduce the temperature or even create pleasant temperatures with a brine-earth heat exchanger in controlled living space ventilation.
What about durability: why is it said that wooden houses supposedly don’t last as long, and what is a realistic lifespan?
What are the real disadvantages of a modern timber-frame prefabricated house from established providers (Bien-Zenker, Weberhaus)? Not meant are those things from Poland or the Hunsrück.