Dining table 2m or 2.20m... we are unsure

2020-06-13 21:45:28

So even with 220 you can't sit three people side by side. We have 200 and three chairs fit just barely next to each other. To be able to sit properly side by side, it has to be 240 or more.

2020-06-13 21:48:31

As I understood TE, it's not about sitting, but about standing. Those are still two different things if you don't have the place full of people for coffee every day. They stand decorated opposite each other, and can be rearranged if needed, e.g. for a Skat round.

2020-06-13 21:52:58

As I understood OP, it's not about sitting, but about placing. Those are still two different things, if you don't have the place full with coffee guests every day.
They stand decorated opposite each other, if needed, e.g. for a skat round, you can rearrange.

That's correct. That's how we have it currently. And unfortunately still will, because as I said, the table is too good to be replaced.
Nevertheless, if we needed a new one, it would be at least 2.40 meters. Preferably 2.80 - 3.00 meters.
Always assuming there is enough space.

2020-06-13 22:50:26

For your request to place chairs 3 and 3 opposite each other, the table length is not the only decisive criterion. Chair width, string height, and - as you already mention - the position of the table legs are additional parameters. Of course, you can fit 3 chairs side by side with a 2m table. It is then "cozy" for sitting while eating.

2020-06-13 23:31:54

For your request to place the chairs 3 and 3 opposite each other, the table length is not the only decisive criterion. Chair width, stringer height, and – as you already mention – the position of the table legs are further parameters. Of course, you can fit 3 chairs next to each other with a 2m table. For sitting while eating, it is then "cozy".

Cozy. True

2020-06-19 08:30:08

wouldn't it be easiest to buy an extendable table?

Dining table 2m or 2.20m... we are unsure

FloHB123

ypg

Tarnari

hampshire

Tarnari

Alessandro