Thirteen
2022-04-21 11:18:53
- #1
You have a natural height of 225.7 m +/- in the top corner, that is above your terrace. I would have intercepted that with plants and a small step.
At the same time, it still takes away the view of your terrace if a field path is built there. However, if this path comes, you could also use it as an access to your property (maybe).
No, I would have planned the transition to your parents below. There is the possibility to create a natural visual shield to the street with hedges.
At the top, I would have left only a strip of natural terrain. Once so that the lawnmower does not have to be carried over steps and to save a wall on the side to your parents. Whether that works, no idea, I am no earthworks specialist
Ah okay, then I understood it correctly. I was just a bit confused because "Weg" is written in the uppermost corner on your drawing.
Our earthworks specialist said he won’t model the terrain significantly; that’s supposed to be done later by the garden landscaper. We had imagined it differently, or it was agreed somewhat differently...
And that is exactly the problem. We already involved garden and landscape specialists and an earthworks specialist before planning so that they could tell us what makes the most sense. We passed that on to the architects, asked again and again, and despite everything, this is what came out. Didn’t the architects feel like doing their job properly? Well, with ours I know for sure, he really had no clue and wasn’t even able to read the development plan correctly...