aw39_bonn
2022-02-06 19:22:24
- #1
Completely subjective. I know.
But:? Well, a modest settlement house at the front, a flashy chalet at the back. That doesn’t fit together at all for me. The side view accordingly looks like an indoor ski hall.
I also suspect that demolition and new construction is cheaper than neatly connecting the extension to the old building.
What has to be said about this:
The footprint absolutely does not change, it remains at 8x8m, which may look different in the pictures due to differences in zoom level and angle.
I find your point about the difference from front to back understandable, but I actually liked keeping it inconspicuous at the front. I consider the label flashy chalet a bit exaggerated in view of a total of 160m2 ;). However, I still have some difficulties with the side view myself. Maybe you have a good idea there?
Demolition + new build: Unrealistic. 160m2 x 2000 euros already amounts to 320k€. Without taking into account ancillary building costs, demolition costs, and the displeasure of my parents-in-law ;)