Cost assessment for used purchase

  • Erstellt am 2016-10-09 11:32:31

Peanuts74

2016-11-02 07:09:31
  • #1
The seller must still be able to decide for himself. And if he signals that there is still room for negotiation at that price, then the agent should not dismiss that. BTW, he will only do that if he has an exclusive contract and no one can get ahead of him. And exploiting that and possibly acting not in the interest of the seller, who may want to sell quickly, I find outrageous.

[Aufforderung zum Rechtsbruch entfernt - Mod. Dirk Grafe]
 

DG

2016-11-02 09:27:14
  • #2


That is pretty much the dumbest thing you can advise/do - rather, I advise both of you to immediately and permanently refrain from such considerations as long as the broker’s mandate has not expired.

The broker will definitely find out and then has a legal claim to the full commission.

Moreover, the supposed circumvention of the broker is completely pointless – the broker does not even have the possibility to block an offer, even if he likes to communicate it that way. You submit the offer in writing to the broker and inquire with the seller whether he has received it.

If the broker actually blocks the forwarding of a written offer, he would violate his contractual duties and then the way would of course be clear for an agreement without a broker. Definitely not before.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe
 

Peanuts74

2016-11-02 12:55:34
  • #3
I did not urge anywhere to "bypass" the broker, but merely to communicate with the seller. How else, please, should one inquire whether he has received the written offer if one cannot contact the seller? And nothing is done in writing with us either; usually, the seller, interested party, and broker sit together and negotiate. Of course, if it is a good house in a sought-after location at a reasonable price, and the broker also has an exclusive contract, from his point of view there is no hurry; he will hope to sell the house at the full price. But if the seller wants or must sell quickly and would therefore also accept a price reduction, then the broker has the duty to act accordingly! And for that sole reason I had recommended getting in touch with the seller. There are ways to outsmart the broker, for that I, who also work as a broker on the side myself, have not called for!
 

Bauexperte

2016-11-02 13:41:31
  • #4

On the side - what exactly is meant by that?

Rhineland greetings
 

Peanuts74

2016-11-02 14:20:04
  • #5


That I work freelance for a larger broker alongside my regular job...
 

Bauexperte

2016-11-02 15:12:16
  • #6
Thank you.

Rhenish greetings
 

Similar topics
21.03.2015Property and Real Estate Agent16
05.10.2016Apartment sale through an agent - what to pay attention to?27
04.05.2021Broker for owners - benefits / advantages?153
02.10.2018Negotiation strategy with the agent and the seller40
24.10.2018Broker sells house without current building permit. Notary costs?25
24.04.2020How do brokers negotiate the purchase price?43
28.10.2019Sale of condominium via homeowners association or real estate agent55
01.11.2019Buying property - How to proceed? Realtor, bank, owner?15
02.02.2020Payment plan (Broker and Developer Regulation) and Developer's payment plan10
05.05.2020Selling a house with or without an agent34
24.06.2021The broker does not take a clear stance on financing. How to behave?42
13.01.2021Broker fraud or tax evasion?63
19.07.2021Is the broker contract legal?11
28.01.2022Apartment sale - agent search order, still commission for the seller?11
27.01.2024House purchase through agent, now contract terminated18
15.02.2024Close with a different selling price than discussed with the broker?35
06.07.2024Loan brokerage through the broker11

Oben