Construction financing with child support?

I would let the ex crash hard against the wall. It wouldn’t be my problem that she doesn’t have the financial means to maintain a house.

That could be done, but in return the man still gets his shares in a multi-family house transferred to him. Although I believe it was never mentioned how much anything is worth, I assume that financially it is better for the man to play along here in order to get the multi-family house.

The only one here who is not objective is you. The whole thread is full of assumptions and allegations. Yet you want neutral answers... As already said: one can wait until the ultimatum. But one can also "accuse of lying" and let discussions happen. That alone is happening here.

Thank you very much for your opinion.

All the best to you!

It could be done, but in return the man also gets his shares in a multi-family house transferred to him. Although I don't think it was ever stated how much anything is worth, I assume that financially it is better for the man to play along here in order to get the multi-family house.

The transfers are regulated by the court, therefore enforceable.

The transfers are regulated by the court, ergo enforceable.

And still, you first have to get it enforced. It takes a long time and possibly costs a lot of money.

Why? You only know the story from one side. It is not for us to judge anything. Moreover, the story is very classic if you keep your eyes open.

Well, for whatever reason you take the perspective of the ex-wife and read criticisms where there are none. I only see the man who, for reasons unknown to me, partly finances the life of the ex-wife. The man reacted wrongly at some point. When you separate, you also have to separate finances and assets. This includes selling the house or the immediate or possibly timely release from the loan upon separation. If you cannot be paid out, then it's back to selling. I have been happily together with my wife for 15 years (married for 13) and we have already talked about this. The house will have to be sold despite the children. No one will enrich themselves at the expense of the other or partly finance the other's life.

I only see the man who, for reasons unknown to me, co-finances the ex-wife's life.

Children. His children.

I have been happily together with my wife for 15 years (married for 13) and we have already talked about this. The house will have to be sold despite the children. No one will enrich themselves at the expense of the other or co-finance the other's life.

Yes, it is always good to imagine such a worst case and make arrangements. Nevertheless, theory and practice are often not the same, especially when situations can change over the years. Quote start: Zaba12, post: 465948, member: 29788"] Well, for whatever reason, you take the perspective of the ex-wife [/QUOTE] Is that so? I am in the other situation. But no matter: I know there are always two sides and not always the one that presents itself to the outside world holds the exclusive right.