Alex85
2018-01-20 15:05:37
- #1
That's how it is, you can also execute ETICS in a higher quality. But even that does not provide absolute security. For that, you get, for example, thin wall constructions; otherwise only wood comes close.
Brick facades can also be damaged, especially by getting wet. Pest infestation through ventilation holes, washed out/defective (shoutout to Kärcher) joints (which is cheaper, renewing them after 10-15 years or repainting?). Insulation (if made of mineral wool) can also get wet and thus become non-functional. Those on a budget use EPS ("Styrofoam") as insulation there and thus have the environmental argument and "no plastic on the facade," which is often brought up against ETICS, also in cavity wall construction. Monolithic building involves accepting large thermal bridges at windows and intermediate ceilings. Again, scenarios can be constructed that argue against this.
There simply is no "perfect" wall construction.
Brick facades can also be damaged, especially by getting wet. Pest infestation through ventilation holes, washed out/defective (shoutout to Kärcher) joints (which is cheaper, renewing them after 10-15 years or repainting?). Insulation (if made of mineral wool) can also get wet and thus become non-functional. Those on a budget use EPS ("Styrofoam") as insulation there and thus have the environmental argument and "no plastic on the facade," which is often brought up against ETICS, also in cavity wall construction. Monolithic building involves accepting large thermal bridges at windows and intermediate ceilings. Again, scenarios can be constructed that argue against this.
There simply is no "perfect" wall construction.