FamilieimHaus
2016-12-19 09:40:14
- #1
Good morning!
Thank you very much for your responses.
We have noted the electricity provider’s right of way. If the information we received from the city is correct, we would accept that. However, I will ask the provider directly again.
We had actually thought the waste collection point was for glass containers. I believe it was marked accordingly in the urban planning draft. I will also inquire with the city about this. Having to roll trash bins all the way to the street wouldn’t be ideal...
We understand that the development costs will be additional. Unfortunately, the city could not/would not provide us with further information on this at the time of the offer submission. That is why I am also asking about it (and also about the development start or possible construction start). I had actually hoped for more information in the approval letter...
The area to be developed now was always designated as possible expansion space for the cemetery or pasture land. So the quiet neighbors are next door, not below ;-). Cemetery visitors are unlikely to use the turning circle for parking, since the cemetery entrance is exactly on the other side. There are also parking spaces available there. Disturbances from funerals probably won’t occur often either; it is a rather small village cemetery. In addition, the boundary to the property is well protected with a steel mesh fence and a fairly dense beech hedge.
Our current plan is to place the garage directly on plot no. 13 and the house next to it. The garage would be set back to the rear so that the house entrance is on the side (along the long side of the house) facing the garage driveway. Possibly, the area in front of the garage / the house entrance could be covered. Hmm, is that understandable?
I hope I have not overlooked any comments. I will get back to you when I have new information from the city.
Until then, further opinions are very welcome!
Thank you very much for your responses.
We have noted the electricity provider’s right of way. If the information we received from the city is correct, we would accept that. However, I will ask the provider directly again.
We had actually thought the waste collection point was for glass containers. I believe it was marked accordingly in the urban planning draft. I will also inquire with the city about this. Having to roll trash bins all the way to the street wouldn’t be ideal...
We understand that the development costs will be additional. Unfortunately, the city could not/would not provide us with further information on this at the time of the offer submission. That is why I am also asking about it (and also about the development start or possible construction start). I had actually hoped for more information in the approval letter...
The area to be developed now was always designated as possible expansion space for the cemetery or pasture land. So the quiet neighbors are next door, not below ;-). Cemetery visitors are unlikely to use the turning circle for parking, since the cemetery entrance is exactly on the other side. There are also parking spaces available there. Disturbances from funerals probably won’t occur often either; it is a rather small village cemetery. In addition, the boundary to the property is well protected with a steel mesh fence and a fairly dense beech hedge.
Our current plan is to place the garage directly on plot no. 13 and the house next to it. The garage would be set back to the rear so that the house entrance is on the side (along the long side of the house) facing the garage driveway. Possibly, the area in front of the garage / the house entrance could be covered. Hmm, is that understandable?
I hope I have not overlooked any comments. I will get back to you when I have new information from the city.
Until then, further opinions are very welcome!