Bungalow on fire wall

  • Erstellt am 2014-10-06 13:30:47

ypg

2014-10-13 23:27:05
  • #1
I like the approach of . Of course, it is "only" an approach, an example of how you can start with the existing information. I have also thought about it and also about two staggered rectangles so that courtyards are created. But I would also see the bedroom more facing the garden. Playing with the rooms and possibilities quickly gives you the perspective that certain rooms take up too much space on the outer walls, as already says. Nevertheless, a lot of information is missing. For example, the length of the neighboring building... how much distance to the north property, what is the floor area ratio, and, and... Even if the building authority makes statements, a good architect can identify possibilities for a problematic site that we simply cannot know. Also, the question remains whether a guest room might still be appropriate or a home office. Should the house be built barrier-free? What is on the other side of the wall? For playing around and experimenting, I definitely find such a challenge better than 20 x 30 north-west orientation, but I would like to know all the rules before thinking about things that can only contain half of the possibilities. Regarding the shed roof house: a dressing room would be dispensable. The hallway can take more space. Instead of the bathroom, the utility room; sleeping instead of the utility room, bathroom in the middle. I could also imagine an atrium at the wall inside the house (bathroom with outdoor area), although the floor area of the house would have to be a bit larger. But everything is still open.
 

kbt09

2014-10-14 06:41:22
  • #2
Yes, I fully agree with you, ypg, also with what you already wrote in the other thread. There are still too many parameters missing. Especially parameters that an architect can actually read from development plans, etc.

Things like a third room, also usable as a guest room, I would find sensible, for example.

I simply enjoy planning floor plans and above all wanted to check the possibility of whether everything can basically be designed so that all rooms have windows.
 

frosch006

2014-11-20 00:50:11
  • #3
Hello, I haven't written anything for a long time because I want to clarify the matter with the building authority first, how, what, and where exactly construction is allowed. Unfortunately, I only got the appointment for 12/16/2014.

ma
 

frosch006

2014-12-20 15:30:14
  • #4
Hello, I was at the building authority this week. No definitive statements were made. I am supposed to bring proposals and then it will be reviewed in a team meeting. The problem is, there is officially no residential development according to this plan. However, there are exceptions and such an exception could be made here as well, but that depends on the planned project. It should blend harmoniously into the surroundings and be kept simple. The problem with the boundary development against the fire wall on the south side was also addressed; they of course recognize the issues and are not fundamentally against a partially set-back development. That means a U-shape or two staggered rectangles could be applied if it is well justified. An L-shape is also conceivable, but the long leg must be executed along the fire wall. Regarding the roof shape, they rejected a staggered roof as it appears too busy. A flat roof could be imagined for this project. One can assume a rough direction of maximum 9 meters in width and it should align with the neighboring building on the garden side. Parking possibilities should also be considered. I brought the most recent (1943) land use plan from the city. I am also attaching various other plans. The buildings marked in red will remain. The green marking is meant to indicate the driveway. The blue line is the boundary to the garden; building beyond towards the garden is not allowed and construction should also start from this line in order to create as much airspace as possible at the front area and to make the whole area less dense. You will surely also notice that the roof of the front house is incorrectly drawn; the gable roof is rotated 90 degrees.
 

frosch006

2014-12-21 17:59:50
  • #5
So, now the other photos are added, I couldn't upload them yesterday. I had to change the format first. I have attached an aerial photo to get a better overall impression. Our property is at the level of the "Google" lettering ("Go"ogle) red roof with the large dormer facing the garden.
 

frosch006

2014-12-21 18:01:20
  • #6
 

Similar topics
28.12.2013Conversion of agricultural land to building plot, objection, building authority, building regulations12
17.12.2015Wall on property boundary45
23.05.2017Technology / utility room on the upper floor, opinions?27
20.06.2016Building Authority Approval10
02.04.2018How to secure a slope and design a garden entrance cost-effectively?27
02.10.2018Garden landscaper offer ok or rather totally exaggerated?103
30.06.2025Colorful Garden Chat Picture Thread2692
26.05.2023How to plaster a wall made of formwork blocks, experiences?13
04.01.2022Architect, contract according to HOAI 2013 - refuses to provide service36
02.07.2019Purlin distance from exterior wall or roof16
25.11.2019New single-family house approx. 174 m² floor plan architect55
10.04.2020Rainwater from the roof - drainage in the soil for discharge?12
17.09.2020House connection pillar in the garden vs. house connection directly in the utility room35
24.02.2021Orientation of the house and garden towards the east43
04.07.2021Is a strip foundation necessary at all for a small wall?23
30.06.2021Build a 150-160 sqm single-family house in the parents' garden - overwhelmed!26
23.04.2022Designing a garden on a slope sensibly57
30.08.2024Renovation or demolition and new construction - decision support from the architect?25
24.11.2024Building authority requires open space design plan for single-family house - experiences?37
11.02.2025Floor plan of a new country house in a large garden according to §34 (with demolition)37

Oben