Building inquiry - What is relevant?

  • Erstellt am 2017-02-19 11:52:00

flipmode85

2017-02-20 10:29:24
  • #1


The architect is self-employed! There is also a large construction company here in town; the boss of this construction company and two of his employees sit on the building committee and the municipal council. It is rumored that such construction matters are best handled through this company because applications from precisely this construction company are approved directly.
 

Alex85

2017-02-20 18:31:06
  • #2


The laws of the village...

You are already on the right path, to involve the next higher authority (hopefully professionals) as well.
 

Escroda

2017-02-21 20:43:55
  • #3
Judging by the site plan, the scope of the preliminary building inquiry was rather modest, and I share Iktinos's doubts about good advice from the architect. The site plan does not even include boundary distances, let alone height information. The distance to the existing building is also not specified and is estimated at 2.0 m, which is not approvable with existing wall openings. I suspect there is no development plan, so the construction project must fit into the immediate surroundings according to §34 of the Building Code. The site plan lacks the necessary information about the construction project and the neighboring buildings, such as the number of floors and building heights. What the site plan shows speaks rather against the new building, since there is no second residential building in the hinterland on any neighboring plot. I haven’t checked the BayBO, but the ball catch fence probably triggers setback areas that must not overlap with those of the new building, so a larger boundary distance is required. Of course, the legal recourse is open to you, but under the given circumstances, I see no prospects for success. My advice: wait to see what the building authority writes, study the notarial contract, and look for solutions in talks with the building authority’s caseworker. Or buy yourself a plot in the new development area.
 

flipmode85

2017-02-22 12:20:59
  • #4
It is of course difficult when you have to rely on the work and statements of an architect. We had, of course, a preliminary meeting in the municipality and explained our project. We were met very kindly and the impression was given that everything was no problem. In the municipality, they had also quickly coordinated on site by phone with the district office – the employee at the district office had no concerns either and only suggested securing it with a building inquiry.

The lady even stated that there was the possibility of the municipality taking over the setback areas.

Unfortunately, the land prices here are extremely high, and in addition, a builder has secured a large part of the building plots in the new development area, who now naturally wants to sell the plots along with houses. Thus, we are looking for an affordable solution, which especially fits into our budget so that we can finally say goodbye to this rental apartment.

No minimum distances are recorded in the notarized contract; only a right of access was secured in order to carry out repair work on the ball barrier fence. If setback areas apply to the ball barrier fence, how was it then allowed to be built directly on our property boundary?
 

apokolok

2017-02-22 14:15:05
  • #5
Regardless of the approval feasibility, I would think that over carefully. It will be very tight on the property. You basically won’t have a garden, right, at most you can have a narrow terrace facing south with a direct view of the primary school.
In my opinion, the plot is simply too small to build a single-family house on it. The approval will also fail if there are any building windows or site occupancy index / floor area ratio for the area / property.

Edit: I just looked at the property prices in [Schöllnach]. According to the few available listings, they are around ~60€/m². Is that 'extremely high' for you?
That is a bargain in most parts of Germany and would never make me want to build a house in the parents’ backyard...
 

Escroda

2017-02-22 17:07:10
  • #6
I found a ruling on a ball catch fence: Bavarian VGH, decision of April 16, 2009, file no. 2 ZB 08.3026 ... that the chain-link fence in question does not have the effect equivalent to a building within the meaning of Art. 6 para. 9 BayBO 1998 (Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 2 BayBO 2008) with the consequence that it can be erected without compliance with setback areas... so no setback areas. Who do these information come from? Since an on-site appointment is upcoming, it is best for you to have everything explained directly by the decision-makers on site. Here in the forum it is hardly possible to disclose all facts.
 

Similar topics
30.01.2014Preliminary building inquiry before purchasing property okay, can this information be trusted?15
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
17.06.2016Further procedure in case of rejection of the preliminary building inquiry35
22.08.2016Garage structurally independent - What exactly does that mean?15
12.06.2017The tax office wants to know how we are financing our construction project50
22.09.2017Telephone construction inquiry rejected13
27.11.2017Double garage: boundary construction, 3m distance or also in between?10
28.02.2018Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible118
27.03.2019A potential lawsuit against my construction project is looming! What now?85
14.08.2019Building inquiry / Letter to the District Office12
12.05.2020Extension of garage & workshop - tips?18
01.07.2020Complete offer from the architect? Is the price reasonable?54
27.01.2025Interpretation of the 1957 development plan <-> possibilities for new construction36
06.01.2022Problems with architects - approval procedures18
13.03.2023Preliminary construction inquiry for land purchase: What should be considered?24
13.03.2023Is a 12m border construction "underground garage" possible?12
05.10.2023Single-family house ~200 sqm with double garage on a trapezoidal plot70
20.03.2024Submit a building inquiry in Hamburg16
15.04.2024Is the involvement of the nature conservation authority necessary for a preliminary building inquiry?14
30.06.2024Should the building inquiry with exemption be rejected?11

Oben