Preliminary construction inquiry for land purchase: What should be considered?

  • Erstellt am 2023-02-10 13:10:40

ypg

2023-02-11 10:55:51
  • #1

That’s not supposed to exist.
But I agree that you have to make sure that with the division, the existing property still has enough land area, and your part also enough, so that you can build what you envision according to the neighboring development in the ratio of plot/house floor area.



Nothing works verbally. But to my knowledge, you can simply take the plan, draw a dividing line from the existing property showing what could later be yours, and draw a rectangle there (or two, e.g., for a garage) for the house. A few figures about both new plots and the old one in relation to the built-up areas (sqm) naturally also belong to it (including small calculations). The usual, basically.

That would then be option 2 for you? A development area next door does not mean you are allowed to build on the intended plot. The building authority cares that the house fits into the surroundings, also in terms of the size of the built-up area. This concerns sealing, rainwater, and distances on the plot. That is why many municipalities have minimum plot sizes.

If the existing house is very large, the plot size is too small in number, so the calculations are quite tight, then it makes sense to have an architect do it. Because if I already see on the plan that the existing house with 200 sqm ground floor area must keep 1000 sqm of land, but only 500 sqm can be offered to me from a total of 1500 sqm land, and I am only allowed to build over 100 sqm, then this becomes a small task for an architect.
With a total of 3000 sqm no problem.

Normally, it is done by the one who wants to protect his bigger interests. Usually the owner who decides to sell. Because if the project is no longer of interest to you after your building preliminary inquiry, then he still wants to sell and would rather need the preliminary inquiry himself.
 

11ant

2023-02-11 13:05:53
  • #2
P.S.: a new development area does not automatically include surrounding building gaps within its scope – on the contrary: it is not uncommon that plots directly adjacent to the intended scope (and even more so remnants of already developed plots) remain unplanned or even outside the development area. There are numerous threads about perpetual non-developable land just a stone’s throw away from new development areas. Moreover, some hints were given here – including by me with search terms for further research in this forum – and Yvonne also already asked a noticeable follow-up question (my own follow-up questions are sometimes only to be read between the lines), and the original poster was present in the meantime without responding. I find that a pity. On the one hand, forums live from dialogue, and not least from added value for the readers. An open consultation hour with free advice should still bear fruit. Because it is not "free", the advisors invest time for it.
 

la-ma-ma

2023-02-11 13:38:00
  • #3


Currently, there is a green area. However, our plot would fall within the scope of the resolution to prepare the development plan. Therefore, I assume that the construction can probably be realized according to §34 even without a development plan?



That is good to know, thanks.



That would be option 2 for us, exactly. However, the development might still take quite a while. Therefore, we would favor option 1.



It seems to me that the owner would gladly assign us the task. I find that understandable if we want to have something 'in advance.'
 

kbt09

2023-02-11 13:46:47
  • #4
Well ... depending on what is allowed, a property can be sold cheaper or more expensive. It should therefore be in the seller's interest to know what is possible with the piece of land to be sold.
 

Schorsch_baut

2023-02-11 14:10:27
  • #5
There will be a development plan for the new building area, and it will probably also be applied to your property as part of the resolution to prepare the plan. That would be my assumption.
 

la-ma-ma

2023-02-11 14:17:04
  • #6


But that would only be an advantage, right?
 

Similar topics
30.01.2014Preliminary building inquiry before purchasing property okay, can this information be trusted?15
17.06.2016Further procedure in case of rejection of the preliminary building inquiry35
16.07.2016Purchase Agreement for Land - Building Window - Preliminary Building Inquiry12
02.12.2016Plots in Cologne only through developers?54
20.08.20162 residential units on 185 sqm of land?!21
22.02.2017Building inquiry - What is relevant?12
06.06.2017Local bank markets plots - linked deal26
30.12.2017How to change the floor plan?181
22.09.2017Telephone construction inquiry rejected13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
07.11.2019Experience finding plots by asking neighbors10
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
05.08.2021Divide and develop plots themselves24
26.11.2021Preliminary building inquiry, sale of partial plots, procedure21
12.01.2022Union of two plots - redefine the building envelope?20
16.05.2022Which plots are the best in this building area (with plan)?17
05.09.2023Application for a new development area: Selection of plots41
20.03.2024Submit a building inquiry in Hamburg16
30.06.2024Should the building inquiry with exemption be rejected?11

Oben