Bathroom renovation: Liability issue (Not an old building!)

  • Erstellt am 2020-07-07 20:58:57

HilfeHilfe

2020-07-08 06:41:46
  • #1
Asked why he has concerns?
 

Ollibo

2020-07-08 09:59:08
  • #2


No, not yet. And I could just take someone else. But I find the topic so important that other customers should also look more closely at the order.

For me, the planning mainly came from the installer. And I rather expect him to tell me in advance which measures could cause problems. But since it is more of a standard renovation, I almost think that he might possibly have insurance problems.
If I order a painter who splatters paint all over the parquet, that is also collateral damage. Even then, I expect him to fix it or have it fixed through insurance. Most installers only buy from certain suppliers due to liability anyway. Transparency for the customer is no longer comprehensible even in terms of pricing here. And now also a liability exclusion via a personal certificate?
I wonder why some craftsmen always complain about cheap laborers and career changers. On the other hand, apparently demand the same performance and liability for twice the money.
 

ypg

2020-07-08 14:45:01
  • #3


Bad example. The painter himself can be responsible for whether he handles brush and paint cautiously.
With a wall he doesn't know, he doesn't know how it will react. It could be that an insurance won't cover such a thing.
I don't want to absolve the craftsman of his responsibility, but there is always more than just black and white and one's own opinion. Ultimately, it is still up to the craftsman whether he accepts a job or not.
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-07-08 17:27:34
  • #4
I don't know how you talk to the craftsman. But your reactions in the postings suggest that. There is freedom of contract, he doesn't have to accept the order and you don't have to award it.
 

Ollibo

2020-07-08 18:52:36
  • #5


I can live with that. And that would also be honest. But I then expect that he discusses any concerns with me or rejects the job. However, slipping in a trap in the fine print that simply absolves him confuses me.
 

Ollibo

2020-07-08 18:58:09
  • #6
That is equally true. I may have gotten a bit worked up about his additional offer. I am sorry about that. However, this sentence in the fine print is also not very customer-friendly and should have been discussed by him during the on-site planning—if he sees any concerns somewhere. That way I feel a bit taken advantage of. Since it is a contractual relationship with potentially far-reaching consequences, I would have preferred that such things be discussed with me. This has caused a trust issue.
 

Similar topics
09.01.2009Painter - Do-it yourself. Differences?13
31.03.2015Property / Financing amount / Insurance? Experiences10
13.05.2016Which of you has disability insurance?114
28.07.2016Window sills after the painter12
20.11.2017Consequential water damage - Experiences with insurance?25
31.03.2018Painters did not cover the windows - endless plastering work13
02.07.2020Are professional painters worthwhile? Or do it yourself?32
05.06.2019Search for real estate loan advantages/disadvantages insurance vs bank22
03.07.2021Paint the steel staircase yourself or leave it to the painter?19
02.07.2021Liability in case of exemption from approval17
06.09.2021Are painting costs very high or normal?14
26.08.2022Is builder's liability insurance necessary for renovation in existing buildings?17

Oben