I see one of the main reasons we are so absurdly backward with ventilation systems in residential construction here in the landlord-tenant relationship: the landlord understandably only looks at their construction costs. The tenant has so far also completely ignored the additional costs. Heating gets a bit more expensive? Only the tenant notices. Damp corners or moldy silicone seals? Only the tenant notices and doesn’t dare to say anything because if they say something, they (also understandably) get a scolding from the landlord to "ventilate properly." This is ignored to death and at best treated with one of the mold removers sold in large quantities for good reasons. Condensation water runs down the windows in streams? No problem, to combat this, an acquaintance is currently installing triple-glazed windows throughout the whole house.
So yes, as a landlord you only have problems with mold when it is far too late. Not because there was no mold before, but simply because it cannot be seen. That’s the perspective of a landlord over a few decades.
The fact is: the only thing that can speak against a controlled residential ventilation system at all is the initial investment. And when I think about some of those "I took the model house and made everything 20% bigger" and "I can’t live without a double garage and lemon-squeezer roof and fully glazed south wall" house designs, and then the "well, a kitchen with a granite cooking island and steam cooker just costs 30k" and the SUV with extras worth just as much parked in the driveway, I really wonder how many different standards are being applied here. In Cologne they say "kitchen laminate, brocade in the living room" and the whole infrastructure is built as cheaply as possible. Heating? Water? Electricity? As cheap as possible. As if we didn’t already have enough unsalvageable buildings with the paper-thin prefabricated buildings, we happily continue to erect buildings in the landscape where the core was economized on.