Escroda
2019-05-10 11:45:43
- #1
One would have to know all the details of the construction project. With the loss of subordination, your architect is probably right.
It is not stated anywhere like that either. It has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It would be unusual if the building authority was more lenient than the architect. You can ask them yourself.
I cannot understand the building encumbrance like that, at least not any setback surface encumbrance. It is possible that the gable wall has to be secured as a common component if you need it as support for the dormer. Then the neighbor would naturally have to agree.
If your architect is local, he will know how "the people at the office" usually act and avoid known problems. So far, you have not mentioned anything that makes me doubt his competence. Trust his advice or give the forum more information.
If you keep the usual 1.25m distance from the neighbor required before the new building regulations, everyone involved will probably feel safer.
Unfortunately, he couldn't tell me spontaneously where it is stated.
It is not stated anywhere like that either. It has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It would be unusual if the building authority was more lenient than the architect. You can ask them yourself.
I cannot understand the building encumbrance like that, at least not any setback surface encumbrance. It is possible that the gable wall has to be secured as a common component if you need it as support for the dormer. Then the neighbor would naturally have to agree.
If your architect is local, he will know how "the people at the office" usually act and avoid known problems. So far, you have not mentioned anything that makes me doubt his competence. Trust his advice or give the forum more information.
If you keep the usual 1.25m distance from the neighbor required before the new building regulations, everyone involved will probably feel safer.