Grym
2016-01-08 19:36:03
- #1
For maximum cost efficiency, one forgoes hot water.
Your statement is theoretically completely correct. Practically speaking, hardly any homeowner can exactly predict how their usage behavior plus the usage behavior of all other "residents" will be. Just consider, one moves in as a couple or with a baby, but in 15 years there is a small group of teenagers, living as five, perhaps with grandma moved in and living as six. The eldest likes to shower under the Rechtsanwältin-Shower-Brausekopf for 30 minutes at a stretch, grandma wants to take a full bath at least once a day, and every third day the mini-swimming-pool is refilled.
The 500-liter tank is not a bad choice, hygienically completely safe, and compared to the six-figure sums involved in house construction, the higher operating costs are absolutely negligible.
Your statement is theoretically completely correct. Practically speaking, hardly any homeowner can exactly predict how their usage behavior plus the usage behavior of all other "residents" will be. Just consider, one moves in as a couple or with a baby, but in 15 years there is a small group of teenagers, living as five, perhaps with grandma moved in and living as six. The eldest likes to shower under the Rechtsanwältin-Shower-Brausekopf for 30 minutes at a stretch, grandma wants to take a full bath at least once a day, and every third day the mini-swimming-pool is refilled.
The 500-liter tank is not a bad choice, hygienically completely safe, and compared to the six-figure sums involved in house construction, the higher operating costs are absolutely negligible.