Architects' floor plan for a 240m² single-family Bauhaus house

  • Erstellt am 2016-12-15 18:16:43

Kostiksch

2016-12-16 16:58:22
  • #1




Nothing was copied here... if anything, it was just based on it but almost everything was somehow changed (proportions, rooms, facade, windows, etc.)
 

ypg

2016-12-16 17:14:27
  • #2


From the core planner



You don’t need to fool us – we do have eyes in our heads ... changing a few windows is not enough.
......................................
I have deliberately restrained myself with my comment, which unfortunately is also negative. Luckily has already written my words for me – I fully agree with him.
The exterior view, especially east and south, looks very bulky – no grace of a Bauhaus of today’s times.
Due to the small covered terrace as well as the upper balcony, it looks like a two-family house. The wide house/estate is practically squeezed onto a long, narrow plot.
It does not fit the plot. Even if Mr. Neighbor is building equally squeezed, simply: it is not nice and not fitting!

I wonder why one opens a (main) terrace as well as the living rooms towards the street when the rest of the property offers many possibilities, also regarding construction and privacy screening. Only the regulated distance of 3 meters was observed (more on that later). In this respect, from the living room you will only look onto a street or at best on a hedge, but that hedge already consumes one meter in width. From the garden you have: nothing!
Also, the access from the kitchen to the dining terrace (covered terrace) is way too long and goes through the lounge area. Then you need a butler with a walkie-talkie to serve the salad at the grill.

The use of the garden is also restricted due to the office extension, which apparently is also used or visited by people outside the family. The guest room on the ground floor drastically minimizes the view into the garden of the living area. You could basically do without 500 sqm.
That brings us to the subject of the roof terrace/balcony, which I also question: why a roof terrace that has no relation to the upper living area except for a narrow balcony door from the hallway? If at least there was a sauna in the bathroom above and access to it was created so that one could cool off or relax outside after a sauna session – then the roof terrace would not just seem to be added for the sake of having it? Also, it is far too dangerous for kids because it cannot be overlooked from the garden. The paths to the balcony/roof terrace are too long and cumbersome for hanging laundry. For relaxing or sitting? Who wants to sit up there closed off from the house? What is the garden for?

Regarding the setback distances at the house to the property boundary: as a layman I question whether a two-story building complies with the setback of 3 meters to the property line. Shouldn’t it be somewhat more, the higher the building?

Regarding the interior:
I am thinking about whether it is convoluted. And yes: you enter and somehow as a guest don’t know where to go.
I find the allocation guest/WC good, also that the rooms are not in the entrance area, but they have taken up the space that was actually intended for the open plan (kitchen/dining/living).
The staircase is a dream without children, I wouldn’t want to see my child on it until age 10.
I find the spaciousness okay, the living area is not a huge hall but rather of a modest size.

To reduce the bulkiness of the house and also to comply with the setback on the right side, I would shift the upper complex to the left so that the bedrooms are more in the southwest, and on the right a single-story flat building above the living area.
But: I would choose a different house (or have one designed if you like) where kitchen, dining and living face the garden and the terrace is protected in the southwest.

Edit: with 3 children I see the cloakroom stored under the stairs more, even if as a parent you don’t like it. Eventually, the children will do it, and themselves too, when jackets need to be quickly put away to be needed again shortly after. Thus, the dining area will not have a nice view into the hallway. It could look uninviting.
 

Nofret

2016-12-16 17:17:35
  • #3
.. those are good suggestions ... - the copy from Kern-Haus is to be forgotten...
 

Kostiksch

2016-12-16 17:37:55
  • #4


If you had read my statement carefully, you wouldn't have to write that!



That's fine!

Even though some things in your comment don't really suit me, I still want to thank you very much for your very detailed feedback. That is the first thing that really helps.
In some points, I agree with you.

The guest room on the ground floor is only a guest room when we have visitors and otherwise serves as a play and craft room, so from our perspective, the entire south side on the ground floor is very well used.

On the upper floor, it is difficult to place it so that all sleeping/children's rooms face the south side; otherwise, the house would have to be a long tube, and the stairs would also not fit.

I would be happy to implement your ideas, but we have to consider certain building regulations, office use, number of rooms, etc.
 

ypg

2016-12-16 17:57:30
  • #5


For working and playing, you will lower the blinds anyway



Southwest!



We’re well aware of that here in a building forum.
Nevertheless, one does not exclude the other, because the regulations do not say: Build a block with living rooms facing east, away from your property.

The core house is not the only one of its kind – it is also not the only one that does not fit this property. But if you hire a proper architect, the optimum will be achieved, and then you will have a house that fits!
If you insist that it only works this way and no other: You will have to live in it – not us

Edit: just counter the residential complex along a diagonal
 

Alex85

2016-12-16 18:15:11
  • #6
I also do not like to recognize Bauhaus style.

The staircase and the idea of accommodating three children there are probably from another world as well.

The large work area suggests that colleagues or clients will also be on site. Otherwise, the financial effort for this area would be hard to justify. However, if clients are present, a sensible access is missing. The current entrance to the house is nothing, just the mini hallway. Something else is representative. This implements the requirement "separate work from living," but nothing more.
I find it hard to believe that this is the work of architects.
 

Similar topics
08.03.2019Experience with Duotherm stone, used by Kern-Haus23
27.08.2014Planning living space & kitchen of a semi-detached house in Nuremberg13
08.01.2018Stairs in the hallway, the floor plan is actually already done :o(20
15.10.2015Kitchen planning with deep windows43
26.06.2015Floor plan question, stairs, window, orientation12
20.10.2015Balcony on garage on boundary11
25.07.2019House with roof terrace in Passau71
10.08.2018Installation of floor-to-ceiling window & French balcony, old building, 4th floor12
03.10.2018Determining flooring for roof terrace: landscape gardener or roofer?10
28.12.2018On which of these floor plans can we continue to build?287
30.08.2019Floor plan design: Is the hallway on the ground floor wide enough?57
10.11.2019Tiles or vinyl in kitchen and hallway19
08.09.2020Floor-to-ceiling windows or double-wing door with French balcony?25
09.01.2021Floor plan of a small single-family house on a north slope 170m²20
17.07.2022Floor plan: Door planning living room + pantry17
11.10.2022Floor plan single-family house on sloping plot with terrace / roof terrace18

Oben