Zaba12
2017-12-28 09:32:23
- #1
Now I actually understand where the mistake lies and why the annuity 1.65% + building savings contract 1.25% appears more expensive than just the annuity with 2.04% over 20 years
The financing need after 14 years still amounts to 310 thousand, but I did not reduce the amount by the saved sum of 128,504. After this, the financing need is only 183,469. This amount can then be repaid with 1.25% interest and a repayment rate of 8.93% within 10 years. Thus, in addition to the costs of 78 thousand for the initial annuity, the 12.4 thousand + the closing costs of 3.3 thousand = 93.7 thousand total costs
This would make me 20 thousand cheaper than with the assumed annuity with 2.0% for 20 years and 6% thereafter.
Doesn't everything actually speak for the building savings contract from this consideration?
Somehow I can't imagine that... Then everyone would finance like that.
Isn't there an interest surcharge for the 1% repayment?