sirhc
2015-01-29 13:29:21
- #1
@Help: my thought was: air heat pump instead of gas boiler. Initially a few thousand EUR more costs (1500 or 2000 can be offset again since the gas connection for the house is no longer needed). In the medium term, the air heat pump has the edge thanks to lower operating costs compared to gas. However, this is not much more than my idea so far. I also find the possibility of cooling in summer as well as the combination with ventilation/heat recovery very interesting, aside from the financial aspect. Therefore, a big question mark remains behind ventilation technology.
I see that. You really have to put everything on the same denominator. I just didn’t have any figures yet, whether 1,000 kWh or 10,000 kWh.
For efficiency reasons, I’m currently thinking of a 1.5-story house with a gable roof, without dormers, without skylights, without offsets, close to a square floor plan.
Basically, I would aim for KFW-70, but I don’t know if it’s worth doing it officially, as I don’t know the costs for application, certificates, etc. 50,000 at 1.0% sounds good, but the terms at the house bank probably won’t be much worse. I expect that we will (over)fulfill KfW-70, but whether it’s worth doing everything officially, I still need to find out. But that’s almost off-topic.
Regards
I see that. You really have to put everything on the same denominator. I just didn’t have any figures yet, whether 1,000 kWh or 10,000 kWh.
For efficiency reasons, I’m currently thinking of a 1.5-story house with a gable roof, without dormers, without skylights, without offsets, close to a square floor plan.
Basically, I would aim for KFW-70, but I don’t know if it’s worth doing it officially, as I don’t know the costs for application, certificates, etc. 50,000 at 1.0% sounds good, but the terms at the house bank probably won’t be much worse. I expect that we will (over)fulfill KfW-70, but whether it’s worth doing everything officially, I still need to find out. But that’s almost off-topic.
Regards