Your wishes for a development plan

  • Erstellt am 2020-11-12 10:26:21

Hausbautraum20

2020-11-12 12:47:54
  • #1


Okay, because some people get nausea from pink, there are probably this multitude of rules :-(
Although I am a Bayern fan, a Dortmund house across from me wouldn't bother me.
Pink is not my favorite color either, but I think it is much more important that the owner likes their house than that I like it!

Besides, I prefer to look at a pink house from time to time rather than 100 white cubic houses with anthracite-colored windows and roof.
That is just bleak :-(
 

Tolentino

2020-11-12 13:39:02
  • #2
I am also glad to be building in an area without a development plan, where there are already all sorts of examples.

My wish would actually only be sealing limits, boundary distances, and maximum heights that fit together. Possibly surcharges for animal husbandry & workshops (loud hobbies).
Not really prohibiting anything, just paying attention to the effects and limiting the impact on the neighbors (noise, odor, shading).
 

Müllerin

2020-11-12 14:40:40
  • #3
hmm good start, thanks, hope for more, because:



since I now also belong to them ;) and actually exactly THAT topic (development plans) ultimately brought me to really get involved politically, I thought I'd ask at the source. Of course, I have plenty of my own ideas, but as it is, you have to make everything acceptable in general, and you first have to get your ideas through the council ;)

Ultimately, there is a big problem, no matter what regulations I make: I have to enforce them. So far this does NOT happen here at all. That also has to change. And, hopefully, we all (almost) agree: personal wishes MUST give way in favor of sustainability.
Land consumption must be limited, water must be collected/infiltrated, planning must be for nature first, then humans, and lastly the car. Unfortunately, there also have to be planting regulations, because otherwise, we end up with rock gardens and lawn deserts, as can be seen.

It is very difficult to find a balance between personal freedom and regulations because someone always abuses freedom to the detriment of others.



The maximum height is, for example, difficult, because if one builds a 1.5-pitch gable roof with solar panels on it, and the neighbor builds 2 or 3 full floors in the right direction, then the solar panels may be useless.

The roof shape – well, that is simple, since solar panels are required anyway, and with photovoltaics in addition, some roof shapes are no longer an option.



Exactly – instead of restricting the color, those high-gloss tiles must be banned. There are some nasty new ones that are matte on cloudy days but glaring terribly as soon as the sun shines.
I find fixing ridge direction impossible. We are currently working on getting rid of this nonsense so the houses can be ideally oriented south.



Right, there is no getting around that.



I’m not familiar with all the details ;) regarding the building windows, I can only imagine that houses are meant to be aligned so that person A in their living room doesn’t look directly into person B while sunbathing, or shade their terrace.
I can’t say anything about your other bans, that’s quite specific...

The combination of vertical wooden fences and native plants is probably meant to prevent wire mesh fences with plastic inside. And native plants are well meant but nowadays also have to be adapted to drought resistance. You just have to mix well, but currently many smaller offices don’t even have the skilled personnel to specify this sensibly.



I agree, but many other people obviously don’t. I just got the proposal here for the newest building area and it horrifies me.



THAT would be a dream – I just fear it would be too open. You wouldn’t believe the crazy ideas some people come up with ;)

Glad to receive more ideas!
 

OWLer

2020-11-12 14:51:07
  • #4
That’s exactly what it’s about. I couldn’t quite understand the reactions to my post. The list was by no means complete and other colors/wood etc. are of course also OK. Why does that trigger such a reaction? The freedom of the individual ends where the freedom of others begins. There are really an enormous number of people with too much money and too little taste. I recently discovered a fellow resident in my neighborhood who has a fetish for gold, gravel, and plastic. The house is gilded on all corners and ends in addition to the steel fence. The entire (front) garden is gravelled and planted with plastic boxwood. That’s why I appreciate a restrictive development plan that prohibits waist-high steel fences and demands natural planting.
 

Tolentino

2020-11-12 14:53:53
  • #5
cool! That is, for me, the core task of politicians. That’s why the setback should depend on the height. Motto: Just build 13m high, but then you must keep a 6.5m distance... (The exact formula can of course be recalculated by a solar installer). Why? The flat roof enthusiast just has to mount his photovoltaic panels on racks. Unfortunately that’s true, but what I meant is, instead of bans, to set dynamic rules like my example with the setback depending on the ridge height... In other words, try to tackle the background of the problem rather than just saying you’re not allowed to. And yes, of course that’s not always so easy. But especially bans also bring out the sly cleverness in such people, which a dynamic rule might possibly catch.
 

Stefan001

2020-11-12 15:08:27
  • #6

To what extent do you have the right to judge your taste as correct?
And how do you come to place your personal taste above the taste of the owner on HIS property when you are out in public space?
Your freedom ends where you want to restrict that of another.

PS: As usual here in the forum, a completely exaggerated and aggressive answer from me ;)

I don't like waist-high steel fences either, or gravel gardens or whatever... and above all, I love the colorful houses of the Caribbean. But of course, that wouldn't fly with the gentlemen from the Dachshund Club)
 

Similar topics
29.04.2010Energy Saving Ordinance 2009 even without solar?16
20.01.2012Gas boiler in combination with solar or better pellet?11
25.06.2020Air heat pump or use gas and solar?300
03.07.2013GAS / SOLAR or GAS / Ventilation + Heat Recovery20
07.04.2014Is new construction possible without solar and without a heat pump?20
14.10.2014KfW70 with gas condensing boiler and solar is definitely not possible21
07.12.2015Heating question new building KFW 70 air heat pump + solar, ice storage?29
30.04.2015KFW70 with gas-solar heating65
08.01.2016Photovoltaic system: self-consumption rate with battery and further questions27
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
26.04.201616.03.16: Start of photovoltaic assembly60
10.07.2016Air-water heat pump with photovoltaics or pellet with solar25
18.12.2016Introduction to Photovoltaics (New Construction)25
30.12.2017Heating system new construction (heat pump + stove + solar)35
28.02.2018Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible118
31.12.2019Development plan and the resulting house plan44
18.07.2020Solar possible, how do I proceed? Help, tricks and tips26
25.07.2020New single-family house with liquefied petroleum gas - also possible without photovoltaics or solar?24
22.07.2020Solar panels not available - surcharge / cancellation possible?20
06.07.2022How do photovoltaic system providers search for a new construction?24

Oben