Your wishes for a development plan

  • Erstellt am 2020-11-12 10:26:21

BackSteinGotik

2020-11-13 12:39:24
  • #1


Of course, we constantly discuss the oversupply of building areas and building sites here as well. My provocative counterproposal in your style - why don't you move to a country where nobody likes city villas?

That is actually the core of this discussion. Usually, older people who already own their houses and plots sit at the control points in the administration and the council. Then extensive regulations can easily be made. What, you can’t afford a PlusEnergy house? It protects the environment. Just build somewhere else. The 50 km daily commuting CO2 can then be conveniently ignored, since a plan has been made for the good. Same here with the form. No matter what most builders want – we know better. Why? "It looks better"...
 

haydee

2020-11-13 12:51:19
  • #2
Wells, as written earlier, cannot and must not be drilled everywhere. Furthermore, how does all this affect the groundwater? Everyone draws water from their well when there is no precipitation.
 

Kokovi79

2020-11-13 13:21:57
  • #3

I actually like "regulated" areas that prevent the clustering of urban villas and boxes – the example I mentioned achieves exactly that. There, new modern houses stand or are being built, but their form fits into a Lower Saxony village. Where there are fewer regulations here, exactly what you reject is being built instead.
 

haydee

2020-11-13 13:44:55
  • #4
Many things have their advantages and disadvantages. Nearby, there is a development area where the zoning plan for the bungalow + 2 VG seems to allow any roof shape etc., and there also seems to be no ridge direction. But all the houses are white with anthracite-colored windows, doors, and roofs. The parapet is the same, the paving, even the outdoor facilities look like they were done by the same landscape gardener. It looks very uniform. Definitely not intended that way.
 

ypg

2020-11-13 18:11:35
  • #5

Same with us. So both semi-detached houses by one company, four semi-detached houses by a maximum of 4 companies
 

11ant

2020-11-13 20:52:12
  • #6

If there really are such examples where, in my view, unnecessarily "tight" regulatory corsets have not backfired and/or have even produced exemplary results, then these should be collected and analyzed as best practices (which is also done: council members’ working groups or even committees do day trips to partner municipalities or model communities).

This seems to me to be the central misunderstanding of many development plan cooks: that there is a positive (= at least not inversely proportional) causal relationship between the density of regulations and curbing excesses. Unfortunately, the much more often true and much underestimated (even though we still know too little about its mechanics) is the obviously also causal relationship between "well-intentioned" and "badly done." That is why I recommended evaluating recent previous development plans under the aspect of "what should have been prevented but still happened" or "which evil did we actually want to prevent, and which harmless freedoms were hit instead by troublemakers."

That unfortunately doesn’t help much, because it often exists and does not have the desired effect: those wanting to build would have a desired freedom in Area A but only get a plot in Area B and then try to bend the rules there until they have built an almost A-type house in B.

So something like what I touched on with the proposal of the Balanced Scorecard.
 

Similar topics
08.02.2018Well - Technology, Systems and Costs30
17.02.2019Regulations for Construction Work Standard Times12
29.10.2019Well costs - self-drilling or hiring someone15
11.04.2020Collect rainwater or drill a well?43
31.01.2022Well for garden irrigation41
19.06.2021Well for garden irrigation - improve idea - please provide input26
21.03.2022Irrigation with well - overloaded with about 650 m²24

Oben