The measure of this window replacement at the current time seems to me to be sheer nonsense; these windows would economically be thrown out to the same extent.
That would be the fifth step before the first, and such blind actionism has never been fiscally sensible.
Not knowing about some things yourself is no shame. Many seekers of advice then fall into the hands of charlatans, in your case it is probably just a bungler, so at least not the worst possible luck. But it will still be enough to waste a lot of money.
With the attitude "then we'll first do things we somewhat understand, then they’re already done, and the whole investment doesn’t pile up in a single tax year," you are in good company – but that doesn’t make it any better.
If I remember correctly, you once spoke of ceiling slabs that might still be replaced; and the usage concept still hasn’t been touched. I can hardly imagine a worse time than now to supposedly check off the window issue already – even though I really shouldn’t say that, as I myself once bought my first car radio even before the driving test – but that is a completely different financial dimension.
What, in my opinion, is not outright nonsense, however, is the insulation of the reveal surfaces, because of course they belong to the interface of the exterior walls. Basically, my thought there would also be a more effective insulating material relative to the general wall surface in a slimmer design; but NOT NOW.
The measure at the current time is about as sensible as installing downpipes before having thought about where the bathrooms are supposed to go.