My retrospective experience – later on you always want things to be different. Wire as many as possible in such a way that you can reprogram them later in the ETS to be switchable. You don’t need a switch for each one.
By the way, that was one of our big mistakes; we thought about what should all be switchable and then defined a switch position for everything. Leads to an endless number of switches, which we don’t need anymore thanks to scenes today. Same with the venetian blinds – a switch for each (6 in the living room with rocker switches, so 6 rockers) and today I use exactly 4 scenes (with individual buttons). Alternatively, there are switches with multiple levels, or room temperature controllers with displays where switching levels can also be shown. Yes, and then the visualization as well...
I probably expressed myself incorrectly there. By switchable I don’t mean switches in the classical sense. The plan is to install a smart button from MDT only in frequently used rooms. The rest to be done via PMs. By switchable I meant more the ability to switch via the bus. Not manually.
Example: from time to time I spend time trying to figure out how to somehow integrate our Logitech Harmony. The idea so far is: a socket that “notices” voltage changes, i.e. implements "Ok, no standby on the TV" -> Harmony starts all relevant devices -> socket sends to the bus "increased current flow" -> bus sends blinds down, lights on/off as needed.
I’m currently trying to create such things in my head and of course considering what I need for that, and where.
Another example: I’m considering using the Steinel True Presence PM in the living/dining area. It also has a temperature sensor, CO2 and more. How could such a PM be used most beneficially...
Maybe it’s clearer now what kind of inspiration we are currently looking for...