I don't see it that way. What does it have to do with solving burglaries if the clearance is counted in the statistics as soon as there is a suspect? Wouldn't it be more correct if the statistics were only updated when the suspect is also proven guilty of the crime? And the further assignments should also be carried out accordingly.
I think we have misunderstood the terminology a bit: I was under the impression that the case is considered closed and appears in the statistics when the suspect is proven guilty of the crime. Here, the judge may possibly see the evidence differently. (A judge's verdict can potentially take 1-2 years to be issued, given how overworked our courts are.) You believe that the case appears in the statistics once a potentially suspicious person has been identified in general (even if the crime cannot be proven against him). <-- somehow illogical
I see it similarly with the assigned additional crimes. In my opinion, these are closed when you can (almost) conclusively assign the crime to the offender arrested in another case.
But I do not compile the statistics myself and therefore cannot judge under what criteria the cases are considered closed.
But: We are deviating from the topic.