Video doorbell and surveillance camera for new construction

2022-07-25 11:19:02

The plaintiff is ultimately you, because as the owner you will want to use the video recordings as evidence (for a break-in or whatever), otherwise I wouldn't need recordings etc. If the recording now shows more than it is allowed to, the evidence can be dismissed as inadmissible and the camera/recording wouldn't have helped you at all.

Shouldn't there be something like in video conferences for video doorbells?? Meaning that you see the person in front but the background is obscured.

2022-07-25 11:22:04

Doesn't it not matter anyway if it is not recorded? With a video doorbell, one's own interest in a recording would probably be quite low or would treat niche cases, right?

2022-07-25 11:34:03

Isn't there a difference between a doorbell (recording only after active activation of the door chime) and a surveillance camera (recording triggered by motion detection)

2022-07-25 11:43:25

Isn't there a difference between a doorbell (recording only after active pressing of the doorbell) and a surveillance camera (recording triggered by motion detection)?

With mine, I combined that; snapshots of the people who rang the doorbell are taken on the internal SD card (so I know who I missed), and I also record on motion (a NAS with Surveillance Station). In my field of view is almost the entire sidewalk to the front door and my current bicycle parking spot ...)

2022-07-25 11:54:52

Ok, I find that rather worrying. So that recording already starts when the doorbell rings or there is movement. Strictly speaking, shouldn't there be a data protection notice on the front door?

2022-07-25 11:59:09

I would also find that concerning if I knew and it was IN FRONT of the door instead of BEHIND it :D. But the camera is so unobtrusive and with an extreme fisheye ... and I say, where there is no plaintiff ...

Video doorbell and surveillance camera for new construction

Neubau2022

Tolentino

Musketier

i_b_n_a_n

Tolentino

i_b_n_a_n