Nope. Wrong does not become right just because an overwhelmed official stamps it. You can observe this time and again when a higher authority overturns or at least corrects judgments. [...] Let there be a neighbor who is dissatisfied anyway and bored.
In a constitutional state, even a faulty administrative act becomes legally binding after the objection period expires. And even within this period, an opponent must have standing to sue – in the case of the neighbor, their status as a neighbor counts regardless of their boredom. A competent administrative court is responsible, which neither on its own would hold an Armageddon nor appoint a public prosecutor, and even then a faulty administrative act would not be an official offense requiring ex officio investigation. Such an error by the building authority would thus be quite quickly in practice "time-barred."
Is a cripple forest maker a subspecies of a hip roof? Like a dachshund is a dog? Or is it a fox?
A dog is a living being with feelings, and accordingly a dachshund looks pretty forlorn when you deny it its dog nature. A hip roof is a thing. If the bored neighbor from your example appeals to the administrative court within the objection period, the responsible presiding judge there is more often a man and will rule according to the technical facts than it would be a female judge who, like Yvonne, visually sees
me sitting in the wrong movie.