11ant
2023-05-11 13:45:51
- #1
The approval (4) and execution (5) should then be done by the carpenter, right? Because he also builds and knows his system down to the millimeter?
To make it short: correctly understood in the result, and the reasoning can be accepted as is.
My own constructed example: The architect plans up to the approval. The building authority approves and the carpenter then says, okay, but I have to execute differently, we should have gotten approval differently.
If you went to the usual architect who mostly has experience only with masons, that would be exactly the most frequently evaluated risk. In this respect, your above reasoning can be considered appropriate. With the architect cooperative I recommended in post #5, you don’t have this problem, which is why I recommended them here: you could say they specialize in timber frame prefabrication of all manufacturers.