The architect wants to plan only performance phases 1-4

  • Erstellt am 2023-05-10 14:23:00

11ant

2023-05-12 12:01:37
  • #1
What is coordinated, and what kind of architect is it now?
 

Maulwurfbau

2023-05-12 12:07:32
  • #2
Oh, so planning is only done up to 3. Then the construction company takes over. I don't want to throw around the names of third parties here. It is an independent architect. Thanks again for the tips!
 

11ant

2023-05-12 12:14:52
  • #3
I did not mean the name: how did you find him, and is he a Steiner?
 

Maulwurfbau

2023-05-16 08:31:24
  • #4
I would say it is a Steiner. However, he knows what he is getting into and wants to be in contact with the [Holzbaufirma] early on.
 

Aspirant

2023-07-29 20:31:11
  • #5


With the relatively low fixed prices that the "a better place" architects offer, would they even get the Approved seal?
 

11ant

2023-07-30 00:30:31
  • #6
Due to a lack of joint projects, I have no personal impression yet of how their prices can be explained. But I assume that they would not "fail" with , since I do not consider them to be clueless salon planning artists when it comes to prices. How far this group would generally be certifiable for a “seal” I don’t know: in my perception, they are rather an open association of cooperating architects, and it is not yet clear to me who is responsibly in charge there. They probably work closely with the “prefabricated house expert” whom I like to recommend, and mainly design "prefabricated" houses. My approach (and that of the architects I have found) is fundamentally different in that, as is well known, I recommend making the construction method decision first during the dough-rising phase. Whoever seeks my advice and is already biased regarding construction methods, I always try to lead back to the crossroads and have the preconception reviewed first. Of course, there are also reasons “pro (or even: contra) this or that,” but in the “remaining” over 60% of cases, preferences are based on false assumptions – namely the (supposedly) more solid / more durable “solid” house or the faster built / price-secure “prefabricated” house. Unfortunately, the respective “true core” of these popular (mis)beliefs is, in both cases, “not worth the tears.”
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
20.08.2016Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?30
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17
29.01.2019Responsibility of the architect in case of KfW interest and further matters148
27.08.2018New building shell construction selection: Choose a company or architects?52
11.07.2019Possibility of preliminary questions to architects23
13.01.2020Cost of house construction with an architect34
11.03.2020Architects invoice - Amount okay?13
01.07.2020Complete offer from the architect? Is the price reasonable?54
25.09.2024Architect search Munich + surrounding area (recommendations?)15
06.01.2022Problems with architects - approval procedures18
18.01.2023Architect performance phase 1-4 - Which documents are required?33

Oben