pagoni2020
2022-01-24 09:57:15
- #1
I can only agree with and strongly advise you to take a close look at both yourselves. All the statements are true for the person who says them, but since you are an individually sensitive person, all of this has only limited significance. The fact is that both are possible and both have advantages. Only your personal preference can therefore decide. Possibly the term "floating" is a bit confusing. Even if you install it on screed, the screed underneath is also made "floating." As I said, I had exactly this master floor "floating" over 200 sqm and there was none of the floating feeling or vibrations, etc., the floor just lay neatly, so the term "floating" probably causes more worry than necessary. We have now screwed down our current floorboards and also installed them on a floating substructure; nothing floats there. To counter the craftsman who said that laminated flooring feels like glued parquet, in my opinion it feels like a stone floor, and since I see that first-hand with my son, I at least don’t see any optical advantage. In general, I would be cautious with such blanket judgments; nothing beats trying it out yourself. You would notice the difference if you, for example, drop something on the floor in the kitchen. On the glued floor, it will definitely break because it is "hard." Also for children, besides the fact of avoiding a large amount of glue, I would prefer a floating installation. Many years ago I fell on the wooden floor and I think a hard glued floor would have been much more painful. Again: nothing floats and why should one see an optical difference. If you are so particular, then you would have to take a solid wood floor, but also live with its "disadvantages." So: look, walk on it, decide, and don’t let yourself be unnecessarily unsettled by supposed right or wrong.