Solid house or prefabricated house? Which suits us better?

  • Erstellt am 2013-06-28 23:48:32

Jaydee

2013-06-29 19:38:16
  • #1


We are also building a prefab house, but the modification of the planning didn't cost us anything at all. The only thing that costs is of course the difference for, for example, the window size. But even that stays within limits. Of course, bigger windows also cost more than smaller ones.

But we are not building with a "Skoda" prefab house company, but also not with the "Mercedes" among prefab house companies. I would say we are building a "VW".

The house (just under 150 sqm), rectangular, without "frills", without bay windows, without a basement costs us in the execution "almost finished" (so without flooring and painting work) almost exactly €200,000. Then come the typical additional house costs (35 - 40k), the land, painting work, and flooring.

Building a house including additional costs for 200k is actually not possible.
 

ypg

2013-06-29 21:03:44
  • #2
Hello Jaydee,


Your company is not a budget provider either and is – I think – in a good position :)
We are building solid (massive), and what surprised me a lot was that my request for floor-to-ceiling 2-meter windows and 1-meter windows instead of 175 cm and 88 cm cost absolutely nothing. We also took one double element more than standard, that was included as well. Only my extended window band adds a few hundred to the price ;) When I think of S...haus and D...wood :rolleyes:, they charged for everything.



I wouldn’t have thought that... I thought O... would be more expensive!
 

HilfeHilfe

2013-06-29 23:15:21
  • #3


and satisfied so far? Which one is it? I don't know if one is allowed to name it here because of board rules
 

HilfeHilfe

2013-07-05 07:58:20
  • #4
Hello

we have now been to a solid construction company in our region.

City house 140 sqm + additional construction costs + garage + chimney supply

approx. 250,000
 

Bauexperte

2013-07-05 08:29:47
  • #5
Hello,


I can't believe that, especially not that the incidental building costs are supposed to be included. Maybe you could comment on the masonry/roof structure/the equipment/building description?

Rhenish greetings
 

ypg

2013-07-05 10:18:54
  • #6
Development costs (utility providers) are always the responsibility of the builder, as the costs are individual (e.g. Telekom) or depend on the length of the supply lines. Additionally, earthworks: how should the provider already know this? Therefore, I do not believe that these costs are already included.
 

Similar topics
20.07.2011House construction: Equity / incidental construction costs realistic?14
20.03.2013Costs painter, plastering, floor coverings...12
27.02.2015Burglary-proof windows?33
03.06.2014Interior design - windows14
13.03.2014Additional construction costs and realistic additional construction costs?21
11.10.2022List of incidental construction costs. More expensive "on the builder's side"?154
16.01.2018Is an extra charge for colored windows realistic?19
18.06.2014Inspector defect identification, determination of window installation10
18.05.2016Help needed with window arrangement!32
27.05.2015Huge problem with condensation on the window34
20.12.2019Trefz window prices and experiences?14
26.01.2015Window between two rooms13
13.03.2015Opinions on window parapet height sought30
09.04.2015For porthole, special regulations? Window, single-family house 1.5 stories.18
22.04.2015Window, roller shutter, exterior plaster10
28.05.2015Round window - dissatisfied with the interior reveal16
09.02.2016Cost of a single-family house, where is the market heading?119
21.03.2016Own work - floor coverings, painting, tiling, what else?40
18.05.2018Construction costs for a single-family house, additional building costs?24
18.10.2020Baunebenkosten calculation realistic?94

Oben