11ant
2025-01-15 14:51:20
- #1
Actually, in principle (i.e. omitting "down to the smallest detail") it does work, it’s not "complete nonsense." That you started wrongly is correct, and I have explained that to you to some extent. Roughly speaking, you can calculate with 3k/sqm, as long as you are not building on rock or swamp. The house shown would therefore be within range. The slope of the property – assuming some uniformity – would expect about 1.0/1.1 m height difference within the house footprint, which is roughly square as in your example and okay, and foregoing a house-garage connection will pay off.Yes, the cost breakdown, I have to agree with you especially 11ant, is of course complete nonsense. Planning the calculation down to the smallest detail does of course not work in this early planning phase. We overshot the mark or started wrongly. We just wanted to set a rough direction for ourselves whether we have to plan for 700k, 800k or 900k.
You should then best post it in the opening post of the new thread, which you link here. once we have been to an architect or or planner of a construction company. [/QUOTE] No, not "or." You don’t go to a construction company "instead of," but "with" an (“own”) architect or other independent construction consultant. Do the "Module A" with the architect (see my house building schedule), after that you have a "preliminary design." With this you make a "setting of the switches" during the "dough resting phase" (which I can gladly do for you as well) to determine the more appropriate construction method in the specific individual case (here: stone or hybrid, because of the base floor). Afterwards, you have the architect at least plan the design in the determined building method (service phase 3) or commission him for the entire "Module B," also depending on the result of the inquiry round in the switch setting. On your plot, I see it leading to a residential basement planned "with the property," accordingly the above-ground house can be reduced in size.I would use the completed questionnaire at a later time,
You also discuss the energy efficiency level of the house and its stage of completion (for example, as an average earner according to the Building Energy Act, and depending on the extent of own work or individuality of the construction service description, rather a shell house or a raw construction, because remodeling and re-sampling is wasted money) with the architect or other independent construction consultant. Here is an example from your cost calculation: instead of "stairs," you must decide whether it should be a "standard stair à la carte of the general contractor" or a "sculpture stair" (which would mean awarding the contract to another stair builder). Also for "tiles" there are accordingly significant differences between "tiles in decoration according to the choice of the general contractor and in conventional formats" or "designer tiles" / "large format tiles" (analogously also applicable to facing bricks). Regarding the roof truss, especially your dining bay window can trigger a move into noble price regions.