Regarding the living room: If the floor covering is ever renewed (currently a somewhat aged parquet),
Insulating does not help in my knowledge, since wood does not conduct heat, but only assumes the ambient temperature.
The constant topic "parquet despite underfloor heating" exists, but it is not excluded because there is parquet that is "suitable" for underfloor heating, since the thickness of the parquet makes it possible.
You now have older, probably thick parquet, and it simply takes your ambient temperature from the room. At least, it should be so. It does not conduct cold from below or not noticeably, and thus the cellar ceiling insulation will not help either. Of course, I have not experienced this personally, I am only concluding.
Even after hours of heating (normal radiator) one still feels chilly due to permanently cold feet - the floor then has a temperature between 17 and 18°C
How warm is the room? Not at the radiator, but centrally a) at the floor b) at 1.5 meters height c) under the ceiling? Heat is known to rise...
Is that supposed to be a mediocre joke?
Honestly, I would and still would point out that floors in old houses without underfloor heating (or even without a cellar) are better covered with carpets - not without reason did people used to have Persians and runners everywhere.
Floors without underfloor heating simply feel less cozy.
I would suggest that you have a new floor covering laid and underneath it a mobile electric heating coil / retrofit underfloor heating or similar.