Right to information from the notary even after purchase?

  • Erstellt am 2018-04-14 23:19:32

Nordlys

2018-04-15 20:13:03
  • #1
No Alex, I remember that he already talked about this here, with the tenor that the notarial contract includes takeover of the connection costs by the seller, only it is disputed whether up to 10 m or no matter how far. Seller says, up to ten.
 

DReffects

2018-04-15 23:00:18
  • #2
We even asked that before signing in the sense of "is that all? Is there anything else coming?" and the answer to that was "No" – and exactly that no I would like to have confirmed.

The municipality has so far only tried to intimidate – the invoice is from a private company, as is the reminder. The company has not yet provided proof of a commission or contract and has not further responded to the substantive dispute of the invoice.

The municipality is taking sides here and wants to ensure that the addressed property owners (there are dozens...) pay up obediently. Some people were summoned to see the mayor, who then "gave them a lecture"... Especially since I am not a lawyer, I would have liked to ask the notary in the sense of "Is it correct that all water costs are covered by the purchase contract?" and get a binding statement about it. Just like at the signing, only in writing.

Yes.. that’s exactly it. As I interpret it, the entire house connection is included. The only one who can say that for sure, apart from a legal dispute, is the notary who wrote the contract. And I want to avoid escalation with a lawyer etc. :)
 

toxicmolotof

2018-04-15 23:14:52
  • #3
How is the community (or whoever) supposed to know where you are putting your house?

There is also a difference between development costs (up to the property boundary) and house connection costs (on the property).

Reminders are also relatively easy to handle. It only gets interesting when a payment order arrives at your door.

I still wonder who placed the order for the house connection, because it seems to be about these costs.
 

DReffects

2018-04-15 23:47:05
  • #4


The commission is the crux of the matter for me as well. It wasn’t me. My site manager also writes to me that he did not commission the company. The company itself once said in a telephone call (which one can no longer remember now...) that it was commissioned by the municipality.

Therefore also my answer: Please contact the client.

The statute says the following for us:


Here, the property connection is equated with the house connection



As a result, the municipality is obligated to connect.


The one at 1) is also a thing: If I pay the company’s invoice, the connection belongs TO ME. Not to the municipality... should I charge 1€ for every liter of water as a path fee? :D

At 3) it is clarified that the municipality builds the house connection.

Let us come to the costs according to the statute (and it was exactly the same in the purchase contract)



These are also the ONLY reference values for the costs – there is no mention of a length restriction.

The purchase contract then states:



I simply do not see anywhere even the slightest indication that extra costs for the water connection arise for me beyond a certain length, which I should pay to a company from the private sector unknown to me.

I have been trying for over 2 months to get a basis for the invoice from both the municipality and the company. There were three responses:
- the submission for an intimidating talk
- the information with “we’ve always done it this way”
- the reminder

I am not very keen on turning this into a legal dispute now. If the matter is to be paid, then it is. If not, then not. Hence my wish for reliable information through the notary.
 

toxicmolotof

2018-04-16 00:02:08
  • #5
The 3.xxx euros paid? Then just wait until the payment order arrives. Then you have to respond and possibly object. Until then, you should have already consulted a lawyer in advance, because from the moment of delivery you have exactly 14 days to react. And not a minute longer.

What good does it do to philosophize about it now? We only know what you provide us. We do not know if somewhere there are still some clauses hidden somewhere or referenced.

What I know: That somewhere a certain amount of service length is included and it costs extra beyond that... yes, we know that. With gas, electricity, water, cable, it was like that for us.
 

DReffects

2018-04-16 00:13:46
  • #6


;-) Exactly, I don't know that either – that's why I would like to have the statement from the notary. Once again my original question: is there a right to information in this regard?
 

Similar topics
02.06.2016Assistance with property purchase; notary, identifying the owner, cadastral map18
05.11.2014Special request not fulfillable, although stipulated in the purchase contract!16
04.07.2015House contract with financing condition, lawyer wanted10
16.06.2015Land purchase: Questions about the notary24
07.01.2016Basic utility provider house connection - then switch provider?11
28.03.2017Invoice land registry entry not for all buyers?13
18.08.2017First invoice for earthworks and base slab due25
19.10.2017Invoice from the notary - 4 days after the notarization appointment11
20.02.2018Telekom home connection, your experiences. Is Magenta M okay?43
08.03.2018Invoice for water connection despite payment through property price?35
20.03.2018Land contract notarized unilaterally by the notary - Change the notary?16
06.11.2018House connection: Telekom does not want to drill through the white tank17
06.02.2019Purchase contract, is review by a lawyer required?11
17.09.2020House connection pillar in the garden vs. house connection directly in the utility room35
12.11.2020Craftsman invoice for replacement of defective tool27
07.11.2020Notary contract land inspection: should it be done or not?24
22.01.2021The invoice contains unauthorized items, how should one proceed?13
02.02.2021The contractor wants to issue an invoice for planning services60
05.07.2023Broadband provider house connection - contact failed60
28.06.2024Building permit - is a lawyer useful?12

Oben