HubiTrubi40
2021-09-27 10:14:26
- #1
Thank you for your assessment. Earlier (before I saw your reply), I spoke on the phone with a local floor installer. They said that it might be possible, of course depending on the subfloor, to lay directly over the tiles. But that probably doesn’t change the fact that the screed would still need to be repaired or, in this context, that a demolition would have to be done anyway. In the basement, I could possibly live with leaving the tiles in place. However, I also have the problem with the crack there. If you are not replacing the floor covering anyway, can you then just leave it, or is that a risk (moisture ingress, etc.)? Can it be assumed that there was possibly poor construction work or is this a "normal" phenomenon? What the expert also noticed is that, for example, there is water damage under the bathroom. This can only happen if no sealing was installed there. In general, the expansion joint was forgotten at the transitions from drywall to the sidewall, which is why there are cracks there as well, although these are probably more of an aesthetic concern than a functional one.