ypg
2022-05-25 15:13:21
- #1
Me again about the contamination:
In my opinion, you cannot protect yourself.
You can write a lot into a notary contract, but it has to be defined. And without having a report prepared beforehand, there are no comprehensible values.
Where do you want to draw the line? Slightly contaminated, heavily contaminated? So from what value on or other? Is it contaminated in one corner or in several places? ... is it even the oil from the deceased’s tanks or is it the mentioned oil washed up by ?
In principle, that is exactly why soil investigations exist: either the seller offers it as a service (so that anyone will buy in the first place), the buyer arranges one before the purchase himself (to protect himself), or he organizes it after the purchase, to be able to build calmly and cleanly on good ground.
Ultimately, an unconsidered purchase of any property would be possible if one proceeded like this. In my opinion, such a thing only applies in the case of deception and lies. But for that, you don’t need such a clause. The service of a notary should not be overstretched in this regard.
But you can try if you like and then report back. I assume that the community of heirs will then turn to other interested parties and eventually sell to whoever causes no trouble.
That’s why my idea was to negotiate a clause in the purchase contract for reversal with the seller. This clause should include a case of subsequently detected contamination of the soil.
What do you think about that? Is it common and realistic?
We have already received confirmation. Nevertheless, I want to protect myself against such an unforeseeable property characteristic, as it could of course reduce the value.
I want to avoid any further unforeseeable costs arising with this huge volume.
In my opinion, you cannot protect yourself.
You can write a lot into a notary contract, but it has to be defined. And without having a report prepared beforehand, there are no comprehensible values.
Where do you want to draw the line? Slightly contaminated, heavily contaminated? So from what value on or other? Is it contaminated in one corner or in several places? ... is it even the oil from the deceased’s tanks or is it the mentioned oil washed up by ?
In principle, that is exactly why soil investigations exist: either the seller offers it as a service (so that anyone will buy in the first place), the buyer arranges one before the purchase himself (to protect himself), or he organizes it after the purchase, to be able to build calmly and cleanly on good ground.
Ultimately, an unconsidered purchase of any property would be possible if one proceeded like this. In my opinion, such a thing only applies in the case of deception and lies. But for that, you don’t need such a clause. The service of a notary should not be overstretched in this regard.
But you can try if you like and then report back. I assume that the community of heirs will then turn to other interested parties and eventually sell to whoever causes no trouble.