Prefabricated wooden house provider for single-family homes in Lower Saxony

To assess the draft, it would be important to know what your requirements for the house are. In the end, it has to fit you. Somewhere here I once saw the house of ypg, which I really liked from the outside. I wouldn't have wanted to live inside. What I mean is: here we only see the lid: the floor plan, and still need the pot: living habits, to be able to judge what fits and what doesn't.

Sorry, but I have no understanding for such train of thoughts and arguments, as well as for that. In my eyes, the draft is a failure and therefore should not be built.

If this mainly refers to the symmetry of the facade, the question for me would be: Is that fixable with reasonable effort?

To assess the draft, it would be important to know what your requirements for the house are. In the end, everything has to fit for you. Somewhere here I once saw ypg's house, which I really liked from the outside. I wouldn't have wanted to live inside. What I mean is: We only see the lid here: floor plan, and we still need the pot: living habits, to be able to judge what fits and what doesn't.

Our living habits are probably relatively average in the end, meaning we would have been happy with a tried-and-true standard floor plan from any prefab house provider. The main reason for the architect was primarily to have a uniform basis for comparing offers. Requirements for the design were: two roughly equally sized children's rooms on the upper floor, a separate children's bathroom, a study with space for two desks on the ground floor, no open living-dining-kitchen area or rather the option to visually and olfactorily separate the kitchen from the living/dining area, a sauna in the master bathroom, and a south-facing window seat in the living room.

If this mainly refers to the symmetry of the facade, my question would be: Is it fixable with reasonable effort?

In my eyes! Either you design a house that consciously uses symmetry or a different house shape. If it doesn't bother you, then nothing needs to be changed.

Does the planner want to conceal the missing symmetry of the house front with a cheap trick of the suggested tree? I would like to see the frontal house view without this tree, which is missing in the bird's-eye view, by the way. Otherwise, I notice a missing 20cm length of a comfortable sauna, and to me, there are too many sliding doors that are too uncomfortable in the living area. The hallway with 15sqm equally large on the upper floor and even in the basement obviously costs a lot of money, which hopefully will not be missing elsewhere in important areas of the interior. Likewise, the roof shape, square floor plan for the so-called city villa, etc., are all money/space eaters, as well as brickwork. As I said, my concern would always be that I cannot make the interior really nice due to lack of budget. I find the basement figure optimistic; reality often shows that it ends up being more expensive, but ultimately you will each have your reasons for it.

Does the planner want to conceal the missing symmetry of the house front with a cheap trick of the suggested tree?

What you call a cheap trick is, in my eyes, completely legal when it comes to a missing window in the entrance area. It is actually a visual method to balance something out and is used everywhere. Such a thing creates balance.
Nevertheless, the whole gable is shifted.