We are currently in the shell construction phase, and next to the kitchen, the utility room was really the final boss in terms of planning. We submitted a very concrete 'furnishing proposal' on how we imagine the furnishing and distribution of the technology. Our general contractor approved our planning because we left more space for the technology than the prescribed minimum size. We had initially requested these from the general contractor or their subcontractor and then did not receive them with the statement: not to actually plan with these minimum dimensions... So, we gathered the size of the technology itself from the internet and worked on the layout of the utility room (electrics, heat pump, storage tank, water including softening, etc.) including our wishes such as sink, dryer, washing machine, and clothes drying rack. Then we sent it back to the general contractor, received the feedback 'that looks very good,' and now construction is underway. I can understand that every craftsman wants as much space as possible for their trade, but as the builder, I do not want to 'waste' space. For me, that is passive technology, for example, I need the heat pump every day, but I do not have to actively handle it. I’m sorry if that is inconvenient for installation, but I have no square meters to give away, and the quoted craft prices include, for me, a 'pain allowance' for inconvenient installation.