Photovoltaic regulation due to incentives

  • Erstellt am 2021-01-19 21:45:26

Fuchur

2021-01-20 22:01:17
  • #1
For us, the feed-in limitation applies only for 5 years and the subsidy is 3 times higher. I once did a rough calculation, and you should actively counteract this with consumption optimization and charging forecasts. 20 years is actually unreasonable, especially since no one can predict whether the storage will fail after 10+x years. Then you have no storage anymore and still the throttle. I would definitely forgo the subsidy in that case.
 

Similar topics
21.10.2015KfW funding after 01.04.201611
22.12.2015KFW 70 funding still in 201524
17.12.2015Kfw funding 2016 - How to set up construction financing?10
13.01.2016Residential Riester: Using tax advantages without further subsidies?12
10.05.2016KfW funding for two-family house26
07.10.2016BAFA funding tips38
29.06.2016Promotion of soundproof windows11
17.05.2017Photovoltaics initially without storage54
30.09.2018BAFA funding for air-water heat pumps in new construction - how does it work?30
10.12.2017Second residential unit in the house due to KfW funding 15313
01.05.2021Photovoltaic system battery storage subsidy feed-in tariff?44
15.02.2020KFW55 funding + BAFA funding57
24.01.2020Annual performance factor calculation for funding (parameters and calculation tool)29
05.05.2020Photovoltaic system + storage with or without cloud tariff13
08.05.2020Heat pump + photovoltaic system with or without storage11
13.08.2020Is energy storage also unprofitable for electric cars? Costs of wallbox + storage79
09.11.2020Lower Saxony subsidizes photovoltaic storage20
07.11.2021Newly built single-family house - gas or air heat pump + photovoltaics + storage?168
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
06.08.2022Savings photovoltaic system, storage, power cloud41

Oben