And that is exactly the point we need to discuss again. Since no application has been submitted at the time of contract signing, and accordingly nothing has happened on the construction site, it can only be about a fee for the planning or it is seen as us, the customers, making an advance payment for the upcoming construction phases. That is also not awkwardly phrased; everything is introduced with the word [nach].
I am basically someone who believes that no one should have to work for free.
However, I do not find the possible argument that these first 3% are understood as a fee for planning very fortunate. Until contract signing, it is still a project business, and the total price of the house will include that many people gather information and floor plans and then decide against this contracting partner. That’s just how it is. When you buy a car, you presumably also go to several companies, gather information and have corresponding talks, and then do not buy a car everywhere. So I don’t think it’s the best advertisement to then stupidly say that you actually have to pay money for the consultation beforehand.
And in a risk like building a house, I generally find it more reassuring if, as a customer, I still have the leverage of an unpaid invoice in my hand and do not have to make an advance payment. And I think it is rather about this being an advance payment that has been cleverly formulated.
We will inquire about this.