Through research in the meetings of the construction committee, I saw that there was a very similar case in the neighboring village (same municipality). There, a planning office was commissioned, which then planned the property. Four building plots were created. In my opinion, the case is comparable because the original property was also a meadow without a street in the outer area. The street ended directly at the meadow, so similar to my case. The document shows that the municipality commissioned the planning office. The applicant (i.e., the owner) must definitely bear the costs of the land use plan procedure. However much that is (and whether it also includes the planning costs). Unfortunately, the time frame required/was required for the whole matter is not evident from the protocol either. Clearly, it is probably a case-by-case consideration, but the case shows me that the municipality is at least not completely opposed to such matters. We will discuss again in the next few days, and then our first step will lead us to the municipality. Let’s hope that the applicant from the comparison case was not the mayor’s brother-in-law;)